Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
Working in a group has numerous advantages not only for the project outcome but also for the members. Accordingly, some of the class activities would be assigned in group. In my opinion students take lots of benefits from team working rather than doing a projects lonely. I explicate my point of view with following statements.
First and foremost, when teacher define groups to accomplishing a project, students manage themselves to accept responsibility. So, they develop abilities like self-deciplin as a requisite of working in a group. As a result, they learn social ability along with gaining academic experience. A classic example of this situation is my group project in university. The professor asked us to provide a lecture about how textile industry work. The group specified each member responsibilities and we all tried to do their best because we knew that the amount of effort we put in doing our tasks would displayed in the results and the more sense of responsibility we have, the higher grade we can take.
Secondly, students share different ideas in a group that gives new perspective to each member. Thus, they automatically escalate the power of thinking of each other by exchanging new ideas. Actually, one of my group project teach me how to brainstorm and share my idea in a group.
Additionally, due to division of work in a group, tasks would be done quicker. Therefore, students have extra time for learning more materials besides their course. For example, if the project requires learning new software skill which one of the member have it, after finishing the project this person can learn the others this kind of ability.
In conclusion, when teachers assign projects on which students must work together, they provide a situation that students can learn more than a project. Subsequently, the result of project is more than an outcome because they learn a lot of materials.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | mashghanbar | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | liviapabreu | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | liviapabreu | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
- Parents are the best teachers. 60
- It is better to do one project first and then begin to do another than to do several projects at the same time. 73
- TPO 35 Integrated Writing Task 3
- TPO 53-Integrated Writing-Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage. 3
- People learn more by watching television than by reading books. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 116, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... but also for the members. Accordingly, some of the class activities would be assigned in g...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 254, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a project' or simply 'projects'?
Suggestion: a project; projects
...its from team working rather than doing a projects lonely. I explicate my point of view wi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 597, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'display'
Suggestion: display
... effort we put in doing our tasks would displayed in the results and the more sense of re...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, actually, also, besides, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 15.1003584229 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1604.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 316.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07594936709 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8826178483 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575949367089 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.2541068827 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.1111111111 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5555555556 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 5.45110844103 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333368696759 0.236089414692 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107503728717 0.076458572812 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115664197915 0.0737576698707 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20737271396 0.150856017488 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13894532401 0.0645574589148 215% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.