Essay topics: TPO 49- Independent writing
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is universally agreed that human tend to live socially in order to have happier life and making friends is one of the evidence of this tendency. There are substantial number of people who are of the opinion that maintaining friendship with small number of people have great importance for happiness than making a lot of new friends readily. I personally concur with this statement and explain my viewpoint with three points as supports.
First and foremost, the concept of happiness are defined as to constantly have enjoyable time. When we spend more time with small group of people as called them our friends, we spend time to learn their characteristics which help us to trust them. However, our opinions may sometimes differ with each other. Finally, we accustom to the condition and gradually develop or relationship into creating happy atmosphere in which we all enjoy communicating with each other. For instance, my close friend are less than the total number of two hands, but I enjoy being with them. I Know them from more than 10 years ago, and we now get along well with each other. Therefore, with keeping small friendship, we make happily life for ourselves.
Secondly, making friend in a short time cause to end this friendship shortly because as we do not know each other, our behavior may hurt the other. As a result, in the period of being in relationship, these people are more likely to have tough time than being happy. A vivid example is my sister. She has a lot of friends, while she is not very intimate with all of them. Consequently, She is <span style="font-size: 19.36px;">always</span> getting upset from the behavior of her friend, although I think they not as crude as she thinks.
Additionally, the depth of relationship is significant for happiness because people are more wiling to be responsible about each other in respect of the long time they be with together.
In sum, I believe maintaining friendship with small valuable friends are crucial to have happy life. This type of relationship have numerous advantages like creating respect, responsibility etc, which result in happier friendship than making new friend easily.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | behzad ranjbar | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | behzad ranjbar | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | AlanLee | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-04 | AlanLee | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-01 | Daniel Wu | 73 | view |
- It is better to do one project first and then begin to do another than to do several projects at the same time. 70
- TPO 49 Integerated writing 85
- TPO 51 - Integrated Writing- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage. 76
- TPO 35-integarted writing 3
- Scientists are considering the possibility of sending humans to Mars in the coming decades. Although there have been successful manned missions to the Moon in the 1960s and 1970s, Mars is 150 times further away from Earth 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...p, we make happily life for ourselves. Secondly, making friend in a short time ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, as to, for instance, i think, as a result, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1821.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 362.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03038674033 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10006912154 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522099447514 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7799689335 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.166666667 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.44444444444 5.45110844103 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295459704252 0.236089414692 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10284678482 0.076458572812 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0782290990227 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181762111478 0.150856017488 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0652006165762 0.0645574589148 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.