Some parents forbid young children from owning smart phones (cell phones with Internet access), while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch. Which point of view do you think is better, and why?
In this age of high-end technologies, kids should be learning all the necessary techs available to them. However, the usage should be monitored by their immediate parents at all costs. Over usage of technology from small age will lead to various kinds of problem and hinder their proper growth. In my opinion, I will go with the decision to prohibit kids from owning smartphones.
Once reaching the right age, kids need their proper mental and physical growth, owning a smart phone won't solve any of the issues posited. Playing and learning things properly will aid their all-round development. Later in the course of development, smartphones can be introduced to them to aid their growth with the help of online course or smart, high technology applications from the phones.
I completely agree that nowadays, the internet and smartphones are the things that are necessary for the sustenance of modern day life. Still, the mobiles, as well as the internet, are not mandatory for the kids to lead their life. They need to learn first, from their surroundings. They might arise curiosity from seeing it used by people of their surroundings, but their curiosity should also be checked by their parents. The children should be intimidated with the phones ones in a while.
Lastly, using smartphones from small age will hamper their development as well as they might damage their precious eyesight for prolonged use of the phone. Also, inappropriate use of a smartphone with an internet connection will do more harm than good for the children.
To sum it all up, although the children should know about the technologies beforehand, the usage is something that needs to be checked seriously by their parents. Therefore, in my opinion, it is better not to give the smartphones to the kids, which might not help the kid be "smart" in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | Md Lutfor Rahman | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | Md Lutfor Rahman | 71 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | Chayank_11 | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | aliola_214 | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | aliola_214 | 60 | view |
- "Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news. During the same time period, most of the complaints we received from viewers were concerned wit 59
- A true university education encompasses far more than the narrow specialized study of a single discipline Only through exploring the broad spectrum of liberal arts courses can students become truly learned 73
- The first step to self-knowledge is rejection of the familiar. 54
- "The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company. "According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in a 26
- The following argument was made in a newspaper editorial:“The autonomy of any country is based on the strength of its borders; if the number of illegal immigrants entering a country cannot be checked, both its economy and national identity are endangere 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, lastly, so, still, therefore, well, while, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 308.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04220779221 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8197879049 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532467532468 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 618.680645161 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6140662007 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0625 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1875 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153182702029 0.236089414692 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0619022423373 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464894611915 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.094199584328 0.150856017488 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365732129438 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.