IF TWO APPLICANTS FOR A JOB ARE OTHERWISE EQUALLY QUALIFIED, the job should go to the applicant with more experience
In a constant hustle of getting a job, making a resume stand out from all the other candidates, can give you that extra bit of confidence it can edge you over the other candidate and can land you a job or rather a dream job that you have always been thinking about. Some companies look for fresh talent and fresh ideas which comes with fresh candidates. While some of the companies just look at your experience.
I personally disagree in this regard as iam a fresher, it is difficult to find a dream job and to perform well to give your level best at the interview and in the end moment all the credit goes to the one with more experience, doesn’t seem fair does it? Unless given a chance to the fresher or the fewer experienced candidate how will he or her to able to let out his or her new idea, company need fresh and bold ideas to make them reach new levels of success.
Suppose in an interview there are multiple candidates for a particular job position with the same qualification as per the eligibility criteria even if the qualification is the same for a 35 year old person and a fresher who is 22 years old there is a decade of difference in what they have learned there is a huge margin of difference, the 22 year old candidate will be far more advanced in his or her speaking ability, communication skills, problem solving ability, agility, and arsenal of important or useful ideas that can change future, it can change millions of lives that are suffering each day. Giving a chance to that candidate is vital. We all know that in this advanced tech world all of us need to be updated with the new software of life a fresh candidate is that new software that every company should invest in and you may never know that person may be best in the world at the particular job. If we never give a chance to a fresh candidate we might never know the potential that candidate holds.
On contrary we also cannot neglect the fact that experience is vital asset of life. They are the ones who make us capable. With them passing on the experience over to the fresh talent can bring laurels to the company and its people. Sometimes experience is what that makes us stand out cause that is how a person actually learns. So why not give a fresher the treasure of experience and learning.
I strongly believe that other concepts should also be considered and not only academics the valuable skills required can also be in plenty amount in a new candidate. Not just blindly land the job in favor of the experienced one but to carefully analyze what a new candidate has to offer.
Thus I don’t believe that IF TWO APPLICANTS FOR A JOB ARE OTHERWISE EQUALLY QUALIFIED, the job should go to the applicant with more experience because that would be unfair and would be wrong decision to make considering the various assets in which the fresher will be a valuable contribution to the firm.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-04 | sunnyojh | 62 | view |
| 2023-01-28 | Pranav Pipada | 83 | view |
| 2022-10-15 | Tanub922 | 79 | view |
| 2022-07-20 | Thelmacakes | 50 | view |
| 2022-06-01 | jdkarmakar2021@gmail.com | 83 | view |
- Schools should do more to prepare students for the non-academic aspects of adulthood. 66
- School should cut funding for extracurricular activities such as sports and the arts when school buildings are in need of repair. 50
- IF TWO APPLICANTS FOR A JOB ARE OTHERWISE EQUALLY QUALIFIED, the job should go to the applicant with more experience 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In a constant hustle of getting a job, m...
^^
Line 1, column 357, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...deas which comes with fresh candidates. While some of the companies just look at your...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 363, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...hich comes with fresh candidates. While some of the companies just look at your experience....
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 415, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...companies just look at your experience. I personally disagree in this regard as ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 910, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...est in the world at the particular job. If we never give a chance to a fresh candi...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...yze what a new candidate has to offer. Thus I don't believe that IF TWO APPLIC...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, look, may, so, thus, well, while, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 33.0505617978 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2370.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 527.0 442.535393258 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.49715370019 5.05705443957 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79129216042 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55616387694 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.455407969639 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 771.3 704.065955056 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 23.0359550562 135% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 137.22148893 60.3974514979 227% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 139.411764706 118.986275619 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0 23.4991977007 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.76470588235 5.21951772744 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257845424376 0.243740707755 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690986829283 0.0831039109588 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107446867227 0.0758088955206 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147205819754 0.150359130593 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.148185054791 0.0667264976115 222% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 12.1639044944 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.2143820225 128% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.