Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life.
Ever since the Internet became an integral part of our life, the news has been spreading in the best way possible. While some people are willfully ignorant about news around the world, innumerable persons are bound up in the diurnal news. According to my view of things, chasing news is profitable and should be considered as consequential. In what follows, I will expand on my conviction.
First of all, the information presented in news is useful for day-to-day responsibilities. Many people synchronize their activities with the information they acquire through the news. It goes without saying that many people, such as athletes and agriculturists, manage to do their job based on weather condition. For instance, the Political condition is a decisive factor in the value of shares in the stock market. If an agriculturist or a stockbroker does not chase the news, he or she may waste a lot of money, and hence many people will be required to follow the news in order to earn the maximum profit.
Second, in this day and age, we can learn a lot from the events around the world. In order to clarify this point better, one of the advantages of historical records is that the historians check the historical events against today's events to avoid recurring its catastrophic consequences. Reasoning from this fact is that people may suffer from identical problems that were presented in the past. From my standpoint, the same is true for watching or reading the news. In watching the news, we can learn from other people’s mistake. For example, in my country, the high inflation rate is a result of the tendency among people to buy the commodities that they feel their cost may increase in the near future In the past years, there was a similar situation in modern countries. if we learned from modern societies that how to react to this situation, we would be in a better condition. for this reason, I believe that we should follow the events and interpret it to avoid making mistakes.
Given the aforementioned reasons, one can assume that not only we should chase the news, but also we should put it in our daily schedule and try to interpret it in order to implement it in our personal life and society.
- integrated task TPO53 3
- TPO-10 - Integrated Writing Task 73
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO-05 - Integrated Writing Task 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 781, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
... similar situation in modern countries. if we learned from modern societies that h...
^^
Line 5, column 889, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...ion, we would be in a better condition. for this reason, I believe that we should f...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...interpret it to avoid making mistakes. Given the aforementioned reasons, one ca...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, may, second, so, while, for example, for instance, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1842.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 382.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8219895288 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81097228701 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544502617801 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9192354417 48.9658058833 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.333333333 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61111111111 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103742568758 0.236089414692 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0339148668108 0.076458572812 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0355500956424 0.0737576698707 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0619953695121 0.150856017488 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0177938879955 0.0645574589148 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.