The chart below shows the percentage of difference in income between men and women from 1978 to 2008.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The line graph illustrates the income gap between genders in five countries at ten-year intervals between 1978 and 2008.
Overall, there was a reduction in the percentage difference between the incomes of men and women for most of the period. However, after 1998, the percentage gap in gender incomes actually widened in Australia.
In 1978, there was a difference of almost 50% between the incomes of men and women in Japan, compared with about 34% in the USA. Both countries then saw a steady reduction in these figures, so that by 2008 the percentage gaps were 40% and 28% respectively.
There was also a fall in the income gap between genders in the UK and France. In those countries, the perecentage difference in income between men and women was lower than in Japan or the USA. From figures of about 30% and 20% respectively in the UK and France, the percentage decline was gradual, to 26% in the UK and 18% in France by 2008. In contrast, in 1978 the lowest income gap was in Australia. While this remained at about 8% until 1998, it then rose to 24% at the end of the period, overtaking the figure for France.
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The table below shows social and economic indicators for four countries in 1994, according to United Nations statistics. Describe the information shown below in your own words. 78
- The graph below shows the changes in UK birth rate of women in 6 different age groups from 1973 to 2008 87
- The chart below shows the percentage of difference in income between men and women from 1978 to 2008.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types between 2000 and 2009 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 47
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, still, then, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 733.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69871794872 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37663228105 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564102564103 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 202.5 283.868780488 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.6767364274 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.625 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147502076783 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0759454868945 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050827808377 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111581738889 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413868729821 0.0819641961636 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.