Planned development of Islip
The provided diagrams show the current infrastructure of a small town called Islip and its plan of development in the future.
It is clear that there will be a comprehensive change in Islip in housing, commercial and transport facilities according to future plan. Additionally, the school will disappear completely in the planned development.
In present, there is a main road between two long blocks of shops which will be only used for pedestrians according to its development plan. However, a block of shop in the north area of the main road will be demolished to make way of some new facilities such as: bus station, shopping centre, car park and housing area respectively. In contrast, another block of shops to the south of the main road will remain unchanged in the future.
There will be a shrinkage of the park in order to have enough land for construction of one more housing area according to the planned development. Besides, a housing in the south area of shops will be moved to the west of town and there will be a construction of new housing next to the park. Moreover, the school will not exist anymore and replaced by the dual carriageway which surrounds all facilities of Islip in order to enhance the transport efficiency.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-10 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-11 | Marita | 73 | view |
| 2018-12-01 | Sukchain appur 56 | 73 | view |
| 2018-10-21 | Phan Thị Minh Thiện | 67 | view |
| 2018-10-01 | Vyom Shah | 56 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, moreover, so, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 1.00243902439 898% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1039.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85514018692 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90466703352 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485981308411 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.3935591413 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.444444444 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7777777778 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217951590111 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113331556686 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113060348782 0.0843802449381 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186464546059 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119974540022 0.0819641961636 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.