A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
Down the centuries, our living standards have been dramatically changed. With the passage of time, moral values, norms and ethical standards are counted as old fashioned. Nowadays, people have become so materialistic that only financially stable people are considered to be respected. I completely agree to this dilemma that we as human beings have failed to maintain high values and respect for everyone irrespective of their statuses.
In running days, everyone is striving to earn more and more money in order to be recognized as a respectable person. People only consider material values such as person owing a grand house, series of cars and a good bank balance. The source of income is completely neglected. The concept of white money and black money is obsolete now. For instance, I would like to quote an evident example of our politicians here. No one cares from what source these people have earned so much money, their corruption and money laundering is overlooked by their blind followers as they can own people’s vote on the account of one time meal only.
People who are still living with high values and self esteem are considered to be orthodox that do not have the potential to adapt the change. Our youth has been severely affected because of this mindset, they have forgotten basic manners such as respecting elders and showing responsibility towards their family.Unfortunately, this dilemma has also make people insensitive in nature and careless towards their dear ones and society.
To recapitulate the aforementioned, there is no denial that with the passage of time we have emerged as more decent, organized and mature population, but this lifestyle has also triggered a race to become financially strong which will lead to nowhere. The materialistic approach will not only affect existing masses but also will leave a devastating impact on coming generations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-14 | emilju | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-30 | HarleyDao. | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-08 | kushal kushal | 61 | view |
| 2019-05-26 | mary nabil | 56 | view |
| 2019-04-23 | Jency Paul | 56 | view |
- Some people think that radio is the best way to get news while others think that television is better for this purpose.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 67
- Some people say that international sports events make an important contribution to world peace.Do you agree or disagree? 73
- A healthy person is often described as someone who has a good diet, gets plenty of exerciseand avoids stress.What should people do to stay healthy in your country?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or ex 61
- Some people prefer to live in a house while others feel that there are more advantages to living in an apartment. Are there more advantages than disadvantages of living in a house compared with living in an apartment?? 73
- You work for an international company, you have seen an advertisement for a training course which will be useful for your job. Write a letter to your manager,Describe a training course you want to doExplain how the company could help youSay how the course 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 314, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Unfortunately
...ing responsibility towards their family.Unfortunately, this dilemma has also make people inse...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 351, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'made'.
Suggestion: made
...ly.Unfortunately, this dilemma has also make people insensitive in nature and carele...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, still, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1589.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19281045752 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9353045961 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59477124183 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.0430261354 49.4020404114 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.5 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.78571428571 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103071122055 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0341885107601 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0290147557735 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0623441286655 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.015591772362 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.