In most professions and academic fields, imagination is more important than knowledge.
Knowledge is the support and basis for work in all areas, without knowledge you will not go far, while only through imagination there are breakthroughs and changes in all areas. Moreover, I would say that imagination is based on knowledge and multiplies it. Without imagination, there would be no breakthroughs in all areas of life and science.
First of all, if we look at the field of natural science such as physics or chemistry, there may be a lot of people with knowledge in this field who do routine work. But there are also pioneers like Einstein or Lomonosov. Without deep knowledge of physics, Einstein could not even see the problem and think in the direction of relativity of the concept of time or speed. But deeply studying this question and using his imagination, he proposed at that time a completely fantastic theory. The same story happened with Mendeleev, who for a long time plunged into different fields of science, studying everything carefully and using his imagination opened the table of chemical elements.
It may seem that in some professions the imagination is absolutely not necessary, the main knowledge and, as I have already noted, knowledge is the basis of the basics, but then the imagination steps into the work. If we look at the field of banks and Finance, only a rich imagination has helped people to create all these stocks, futures, stock exchanges, options and so on.
In any field and sphere of life knowledge is extremely important, but only imagination changes our world for the better.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-05 | samruddh_shah | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-02 | sukhada11 | 62 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | aniketnichat | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-13 | shahryar2222 | 50 | view |
| 2019-09-10 | fernanf | 50 | view |
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr Karp an anthropologist Twenty years ago Dr Field a noted anthropologist visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rat 79
- This pie charts illustrate the ratio of three different groups of citizens( 0-14 years, 15-59 years, 60+ years) who lived In Yemen and Italy in 2000 and who will live in 2050. 67
- The following appeared in a local newspaper."People should not be misled by the advertising competition between Coldex and Cold-Away, both popular over-the-counter cold medications that anyone can purchase without a doctor's prescription. Each b 63
- Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supp 75
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future. 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 346, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oughs in all areas of life and science. First of all, if we look at the field of...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, may, moreover, so, then, while, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1280.0 2235.4752809 57% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 259.0 442.535393258 59% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94208494208 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79560143216 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 215.323595506 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563706563707 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 400.5 704.065955056 57% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4820832545 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.363636364 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5454545455 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36363636364 5.21951772744 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0746532088793 0.243740707755 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0301331853361 0.0831039109588 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0342723970915 0.0758088955206 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0538742345852 0.150359130593 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327576393611 0.0667264976115 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 100.480337079 53% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.