Young people tend to enjoy their life more than older people do.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 391, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
... to neighbors and sleep. I do not think thats how you enjoy life. On the other hands,...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 522, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...ion, visit places, and enjoy. I suppose thats how we enjoy life. Even if I tell them ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 345, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this technology' or 'These technologies'?
Suggestion: This technology; These technologies
...ee, we can do all the work in our hand. These technology has helped us a lot in order to make us...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 741, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...hat we can do such as Bunjee, Skydiving and etc. Older people were not able to use techn...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 169, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...today have so many options for means to use to enjoy their lives which were not ava...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, likewise, may, nonetheless, second, so, then, therefore, thus, while, as for, for example, for instance, i suppose, i think, such as, in my opinion, in my view, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1967.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 432.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55324074074 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4691241078 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467592592593 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 628.2 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.3329652568 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.68 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.28 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76 5.45110844103 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.448074733544 0.236089414692 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137041585117 0.076458572812 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129840199191 0.0737576698707 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.313362050155 0.150856017488 208% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118180903445 0.0645574589148 183% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 11.7677419355 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.81 10.9000537634 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.11 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.