The line graph below shows the changes in the share price of Outokumpu companies in euros between January 2006 and December 2010.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.
The given line graph represents the variation of share price of outokumpu companies in euros over a period of five years from 2006 to 2010.
Overall, the share price remained almost same in beginning of 2006 and at the end of 2010. However, the price fluctuated significantly in between making new high and low points.
In 2006, the share price was around 12 euros and it rose significantly, making a new high of approximately 32 euros in the beginning of year 2007 but after that it started to decline gradually, showing a minor increase in between. At the end of 2007, share price was at about 22 euros.
In January 2008, the price again started to increase reaching 30 euros which was closest to its peak value, but after that, it declined to 15 euros by the mid of 2008 and ultimately reached a new low of about 7 euros in December 2006. In 2009, there was not a significant margin between starting and ending, it was around 8 euros in January 2009 and 12 euros by the end of 2009. Finally, after some minor fluctuations it reached at about 12 euros in the end of year 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-22 | fachryadul92 | 61 | view |
| 2019-06-08 | Sidhulakhveer17@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2019-04-10 | garikapatideepthi | 78 | view |
| 2019-04-10 | garikapatideepthi | 56 | view |
| 2018-11-02 | ASHISH SAINI | 67 | view |
- Human activity has had a negative effect on plants and animal all over the world. Some people think that it is too late to do something about it. Others think that there is still time to take effective action. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 56
- In countries where unemployment is high education should only be obligatory up to primary school and not secondary school To what extent do you agree or disagree 54
- The two pie charts below show some employment patterns in Great Britain in 1992 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The diagrams below show the changes that have taken place at Queen Mary Hospital since its construction in 1960 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 48
- Some students tend to play computer games rather than do sports Why is this What can be done to tackle the problem 74
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 890.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.49494949495 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52527272719 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494949494949 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.9722160957 43.030603864 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.25 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250210563032 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123266736488 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0699344252752 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18130095134 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059160770718 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.06 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.