The pie charts and table give information about the total value and sources on fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000.
The table illustrates total profit of fish markets in billions of dollars. The pie charts show where were the all of fishes imported to the US bazaar from 1988 to 2000.
Initially, in 1988, Canada was the main sponsor in fishing mart, which was possess the big part of the pie chart. Whereas, China and other countries couldn't do enough import to US. It is clear that, after four years later. other far away country's percentage had increased noticeably between 27% and 46%. A year by year, China's fishy bazaar strongly had grown up more than a past years. US also preferred Canada fishes rather than other once. Yet, they hadn't gotten any attract by receiver from 1992 to 2000.
According to the table, Total value of marketing quite went up significantly. In first year, Income of imported value was only 6,57 billions of dollars. However, we can see from the table US had worked hard which increased between 8,52 and 10,72.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-03 | frettyflacko | 78 | view |
- Some people think that they should spend money they earn now enjoying life while others think that the money should be put into savings for future Discuss both views and give your opinion 76
- Traffic and housing problems in major cities could be solved by moving companies factories and their employees to the countryside Do you agree or disagree 64
- In the recent years children are forced to study even in their leisure time. Is this a good practice? Do you agree or disagree? 73
- The pie charts and table give information about the total value and sources on fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000. 78
- The bar chart shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities Toronto Madrid Kuala Lumpur and Amman 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 76, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'possessed'.
Suggestion: possessed
...main sponsor in fishing mart, which was possess the big part of the pie chart. Whereas,...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 149, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...art. Whereas, China and other countries couldnt do enough import to US. It is clear tha...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 223, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Other
... is clear that, after four years later. other far away countrys percentage had increa...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 379, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'year'?
Suggestion: year
... strongly had grown up more than a past years. US also preferred Canada fishes rather...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 452, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hadn't
...ishes rather than other once. Yet, they hadnt gotten any attract by receiver from 199...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 129, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '57 billion'.
Suggestion: 57 billion
...ar, Income of imported value was only 6,57 billions of dollars. However, we can see from the t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 766.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72839506173 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27408613822 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.679012345679 0.547539520022 124% => OK
syllable_count: 216.9 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 17.990738358 43.030603864 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 63.8333333333 112.824112599 57% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.5 22.9334400587 59% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.08333333333 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314856838684 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101119494682 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.086222652095 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237695909242 0.15604864568 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0989637908127 0.0819641961636 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.6 13.2329268293 57% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 83.66 61.2550243902 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.8 10.3012195122 47% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.56 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.