The diagram below shows how the Australian Bureau of Meteorology collects up-to-the-minute information on the weather in order to produce reliable forecasts.
The picture illustrates the process of collection weather information of Autralian Bureau of Meteorology to make forecasts.
Overall, it is clear that there are 4 distinct stages in the process, from the initial collection of information about the weather to the eventual production of broadcast to the public.
At the first and second stages of the process, the information is collected and analysed from 3 various sources: satellite, radar and drifting buoy. Firstly, incoming information from satellite is picked and presented for analysis as a satellite photo. Secondly, information can be received by radar and presented on a radar screen or synoptic chart. Finally, incoming information is passed by drifting buoy and analysed from a synoptic chart.
Looking at the third stage of this process, this amount of data tranfer into the computer which prepares the broadcast. Eventually, this information is broadcasted throughout 3 devices: TV newsreader, radio and recorded announcement.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-21 | Ken95 | 56 | view |
| 2019-06-23 | subashtimalsina112 | 61 | view |
| 2019-02-22 | raznava | 68 | view |
| 2019-02-10 | Emmanuel Alvarez | 61 | view |
| 2019-01-15 | Rapunzel | 60 | view |
- The diagram below shows how the Australian Bureau of Meteorology collects up-to-the-minute information on the weather in order to produce reliable forecasts. 61
- The diagram below shows how coffee is produced and prepared for sale in supermarkets and shops. 56
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of people living alone in 5 different age groups in the USA between 1850 and 2000 87
- The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparions where relevant. 56
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 845.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59602649007 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10038472156 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596026490066 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.7662997273 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.625 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 5.23603664747 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155503710649 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0786255705705 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0874427703188 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125256147747 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103638740335 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 11.4140731707 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.