Poor nutrition and obesity is a problem in many developed countries and some people believe that a tax on fast food would reduce the problem. Do you agree?
As the growth of some health problems such as intensive obesity and lack of nutrition has an upward trend during last years in developed societies, a great deal of research has been done to evaluate the reasons and solutions. A common held view is that a tax on junk food that is considered as the main reason, would be helpful. Although there is some critics with this idea, but I think it is true to say it is an effective solution for a couple of reason.
First of all, it should be stuck in mind that there is a great tendency for fast food among people, especially children and teenagers. Of course putting tax would lead to decrease in amount of usage of these food, but those people that are keen on junk food, will buy them. Therefore, it would be better to find a root solution which can change people mind and also their life style.
On the other hand, as these food are cheaper than traditional food, people prefer to buy them. While when there is a tax, most of the people prefer to have a healthy male instead of unhealthy food with less quality.
On addition, the income of taxes could be used to make some educational program or advertisement to encourage people to take some exercises. In other words, if there is a plan for income of taxes, it will be an additional tool to reduce the usage of junk food.
All in all, it seems that junk food is causing more poor nutrition and rising the obesity. In my point of view, considering tax on fast food would be a suitable solution in order to improve the diet and health of people, as well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-13 | Mtr6510 | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-03 | dat | 73 | view |
| 2018-12-08 | thaoly0123 | 73 | view |
| 2018-11-13 | yaldaasgari | 61 | view |
- The diagram below shows the process of recycling glass bottles. 73
- In your opinion, what has been the most significant transportation innovation of the past 200 years? 73
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 82
- you recently attend a meeting at a hotel. when you returned home, you found you had left some important papers at the hotel. say where you think you left papersexplain why they are so importanttell the manager what you want him/her to do 73
- The statistics below show basic information about users of three different online social networking sites 64
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 339, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are some critics'?
Suggestion: there are some critics
...main reason, would be helpful. Although there is some critics with this idea, but I think it is true ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 203, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this food' or 'these foods'?
Suggestion: this food; these foods
... lead to decrease in amount of usage of these food, but those people that are keen on junk...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 23, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this food' or 'these foods'?
Suggestion: this food; these foods
...eir life style. On the other hand, as these food are cheaper than traditional food, peop...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: ON_ADDITION[1]
Message: Did you mean 'in'?
Suggestion: In
...d of unhealthy food with less quality. On addition, the income of taxes could be ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, therefore, well, while, i think, of course, such as, first of all, in other words, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1270.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.39446366782 5.12529762239 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34157134895 2.80592935109 83% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543252595156 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 398.7 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6290012076 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.833333333 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0833333333 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 7.06120827912 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27821351991 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0952506207872 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0358094664296 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144165312919 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0186072690017 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 50.2224549098 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.48 12.4159519038 68% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 78.4519038076 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.