tpo extra exams q1
The reading and lecture both discuss the using of sucralose for losing weight. While the reading provides three disadvantages of using the sucrolse, the professor refutes, saying none of these claims are convincing.
Firstly, the reading states that using sucralose cause shrinking of thymus. So, it will hurt the immune system for many people. On the other hand, the professor questions this notion by saying that the studies of sucralose on rats could not cause harmful unless they take large quantities. As a result, comparing to the amount of sucralose that used in the studies, people can eat up to four thousand times per day for a month.
Secondly, the article avers that sucralose belongs to organocholordies. So, it has a toxic effect and it will cause cancer for people who use sucralose on long run. However, the professor rejects this idea by pointing out that organochlorides are toxic substances because these materials build up in the fat tissues and these can cause toxic effect. On other hand, sucralose does not digest very well. So, it does not accumulate in the tissues. Furthermore, sucralose does not cause any dangerous effect.
Lastly, the reading mentions that people who use sucralose their appetite to suger will increased. Moreover, they will eat other more sugar substance. Consequently, it will be hard for them to lose weight. Nevertheless, the professor contradicts this point by explaining that this argue is true for many other sweeteners. This is because other sweeteners break down by heat. However, sucralose does not break up with high heat. As a result, people will not eat more sugar stuff like cookies or cake. Consequently, they can keep their diet on track.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-20 | Seyed Armin Mirhosseini | 80 | view |
| 2020-02-23 | farzaddanaeii | 3 | view |
| 2019-03-07 | simin.n | 73 | view |
| 2018-11-14 | raniamekhaiel | 3 | view |
- The lecture and the passage discuss about the limitation of archarology science. Although the passage claims that the archaeology science has been limited by few financial supporting, job positioning and new foundations to dig, The speaker refutes this id 3
- TPO-50 - Independent Writing Task 3
- TPO-41 - Integrated Writing Task Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harm 66
- TOEFL T P O 34 - Integrated Writing Task 3
- TPO 23 Integrated Writing Task 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 89, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'increase'
Suggestion: increase
... sucralose their appetite to suger will increased. Moreover, they will eat other more sug...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, lastly, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, well, while, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1430.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 280.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10714285714 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71953439893 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 145.348785872 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.631145689 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.5 110.228320801 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.0 21.698381199 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.45 7.06452816374 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.3589403974 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 53.8541721854 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.