Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
It is undoubtedly true that the earnings of famous athletes are much higher than the other important professionals. That's why it is a matter of argument that the remuneration which is paid to successful sportsperson is unfair; however, others believe that their earnings are fully justified. In my opinion, famous professional athletes deserve this massive amount of revenues.
Sport is a form of entertainment and sportsmen are its heroes. It not only entertain us but also releases our mental stress and pain. Because of this, sports are a multi-billion dollars industry. The sportspersons play a crucial role to recreate our lives. The hard work, persistence, and pain they suffer to amuse us are worth that money they earn. Sometimes they suffer serious injuries. So, because of their dedication, they justify a high remuneration.
On the other hand, others think that it is unfair to pay a huge amount of money to famous professional athletes than the other leading professionals. The people of other professionalisms have a significant contribution to society. For instance, doctors spend their whole life to save others lives. In addition to this, researchers are also serving their lives for new inventions that help humankind and society. Thus, they deserve higher earnings than the famous sports athletes. There are also other professionals like the army, police officers, firefighters etc. who risk their lives to save us. Therefore, these are the reasons why famous sportsmen’s earnings are questionable.
To sum up, entertainment is one kind of drug to cure our mental stresses and pains, sports is one of them, and the sportspersons play a vital role in this. So, I confer that because of their dedication, their earnings are entirely legitimate.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-04 | happyhappy | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | Sadrarouhi | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-10 | morbymuku | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-02 | ngannguyen | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-30 | WIWI UMAR | 61 | view |
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000. Describe the information in the table and make comparisons where appropriate. 73
- The graphs below give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010, and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comp 73
- The graph below shows the spending on research into renewable sources of energy in four countries between 1975 and 2000 79
- Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead.To what extent do you agree with this statement? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 117, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...than the other important professionals. Thats why it is a matter of argument that the...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 481, Rule ID: ALSO_OTHER[1]
Message: Use simply 'there are other' or 'there are also'
Suggestion: There are other; There are also
...rnings than the famous sports athletes. There are also other professionals like the army, police off...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in addition, kind of, in my opinion, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1493.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29432624113 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11660168712 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542553191489 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.5339225926 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.65 106.682146367 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.1 20.7667163134 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251863506511 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694415792639 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0690825956426 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140378307093 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0902093966106 0.056905535591 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.81 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.