Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
Raising public health plays the most crucial role of an country. There are some people say that extending the number of sport facilities is the best way to improve public health, however, the opponents underestimate the previously mentioned effect and that other measures are demanded. Thus, this essay below will analyze this issue clearly.
To begin with, public health is the average scale to underscore a healthy of certain population to cope with the diseases and type of bacteria or viruses. Therefore, each individual has to improve oneself ’s body immunity system which is worked such as the barrier to protect us from outside body strange factors and also inside body variation. In particular, sporting and eating health can briskly upgrade the human endurance. For instance, at the time H5N1 viruses were soared in plenty of Asian areas, whereas, in Europe this infection got trouble occasion to attack there due to the public health organization successfully minimized in deterring from this. Theoretically, according to WHO organization: “Preventing is better than treating”, overall initiating to place various sport facilities is the accurate solution for stably raising civilian public health.
On the other hand, there are plenty of way to control the disease but it always need co-operate from organizations, experts and even government. To be more precious, sporting is only one of many solutions but it the same like an active pre-action to create a curtain for obviously protecting individual’s health. As a result, sporting has not been little effect, on the contrary, it is dominated action to deal with the disease.
In conclusion, I completely agree with the supporters for idea, which increase the number of sport facilities and I hope it will quickly diverge to a good trend all over the world.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-12-09 | Eric Liu | 78 | view |
2018-11-29 | dangtrinhlt | 73 | view |
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 78
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of the society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this. 73
- should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves? 56
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required. 61
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people. Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages?Discuss both these views and give your own o 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 54, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...c health plays the most crucial role of an country. There are some people say that...
^^
Line 5, column 81, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'needs'?
Suggestion: needs
...ay to control the disease but it always need co-operate from organizations, experts ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, therefore, thus, whereas, as to, for instance, in conclusion, in particular, such as, as a result, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1559.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32081911263 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95250052905 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641638225256 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.6697442375 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.916666667 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4166666667 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.3333333333 7.06120827912 203% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30467701326 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10490357754 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108512295201 0.0667982634062 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179366444899 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133641359471 0.056905535591 235% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.