Currently, many people fail to balance the work with the other parts of lives, what are the reasons and how to solve it?
Nowadays, the failure of tacking the tense relationship between career development and private life, which produces an adverse effect on the quality of human life, become more and more popular among many employees. While this problem is ascribed to several factors, there are some measures that should be implemented to improve one’s work-life balance.
There are two compelling reasons as to why numerous workers find it hard to strike a proper balance between work and life. Firstly, zeroing in on career can discourage employees from other significant activities such as family life, health management, and personal hobbies. They, as a consequence, may lose the balance between the work and their personal life when they have this habit in long-term. Secondly, excessive workload and fierce competition are the convincing reason why a large number of people have to fully commit themselves to their jobs. Particularly, a new employee is sure to be eliminated out of the cutthroat competition if he or she slackens efforts at self-improvement.
There are solutions which could be adopted to combat the work-life imbalance. The primary measure is that efforts should be made by everyone to x hange their opinion towards career. This is because when people clearly know that success in career will never be the sole aim of life, they could spend more time on their interests and their family. In addition, companies should curtail the heavy workload and create a healthy work environment. Not only can this practice brings happiness to the workers but it may also enhance work efficiency and job productivity.
In conclusion, some factors are conducive to the imbalance between work and life such as focusing on working and the pressure of workload. To solve this situation, there are some effective solution should be implemented, including changing the people’s awareness of work and minimizing workload.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-14 | truognchinh | 84 | view |
- The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year. 78
- The international community must act immediately to ensure that all nations reduce their consumption of fossil fuels a.g gas and oil. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some people believe that to become the vegetarian is the only way to keep healthy. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- It is better for college students to live in school than to live at home with their parents Do you agree or disagree 72
- Nowadays, some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal quanlities when they look for new employees?Why is in this case? Is it positive or negative? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 164, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rse effect on the quality of human life, become more and more popular among many ...
^^
Line 2, column 483, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...mpetition are the convincing reason why a large number of people have to fully commit themselves ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 302, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reness of work and minimizing workload.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, as to, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1618.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32236842105 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87305727449 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598684210526 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6719157937 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.571428571 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64285714286 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133124160464 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0495513175537 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0345454443147 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0846585175398 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358403786153 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.