The bar chart below shows shares of expenditures for five major categories in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Japan in the year 2009.
The bar graph illustrates how consumers in America, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Japan allocated different shares of total spending to certain categories such as food, housing, and transportation in 2009.
Overall, while housing and health care shares of entire expenditures were higher in The United State than in other countries, whereas America had the lowest clothing share. Futhermore, Canada had the largest transportation and clothing shares and Japan had the highest food share among the nations compared.
American had the greatest housing expenditure share, at 26% while the United Kingdom and Japan followed with 24% and 22%, respectively and Canada have the modest housing share, at 21%. Housing was the largest expenditure component in almost given countries except Japan.
By contrast, customers in Canada spent the highest share to transportation in all four nations, at 20%. America and The United Kingdom had the next-largest transportation shares, with 15% and 15%, respectively. In Japan, people spent 23% of their total expenditure on food, which was slighty higher than that in The United Kingdom, at 20%. The lowest expenditure shares was seen in Canada and America.
Health care and clothing shares were much lower than other outgoings in 2009. American expent the greatest healthcare share, at 7%, 1% greater than the figures in Canada and Japan but much more than the figure in The United State. Canada, and The United Kingdom had just over 5% of clothing share compared with just under 5% in Japan and America.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-19 | tranthaolinh27052002 | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-23 | Cherry06 | 67 | view |
| 2019-08-22 | phanduydat | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-18 | lnmt2007 | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-22 | Prabhjot Sanghera | 91 | view |
- Children’s education is expensive. In some countries, the governments pay some or all of the costs. Do the advantages outweigh its disadvantages. 67
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities. 61
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego, California and the rest of the world. 78
- Nowadays, some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal quanlities when they look for new employees?Why is in this case? Is it positive or negative? 84
- The bar chart below shows shares of expenditures for five major categories in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Japan in the year 2009. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, whereas, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 6.8 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1300.0 965.302439024 135% => OK
No of words: 246.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28455284553 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68643525224 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483739837398 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 393.3 283.868780488 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9437616735 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.333333333 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326962567346 0.215688989381 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143283950042 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605317993468 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21682544485 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369590708466 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.