The chart below shows the resources used to make 1000 disposable cups in different materials: polystyrene and paper.
The table illustrates the amount of different resources which is required to produce 1000 disposable polystyrene and paper cups.
Overall, it is apparent that for producing a thousand of paper cups, all the given materials are used is higher than the polystyrene cups, except stem and other chemicals. On the other hand, there is no wood is used for making polystyrene cups.
The highest amount of stem is required to make one thousand of polystyrene cups, and this amount is 130 kg, compared to the paper cups which required only 0.56 kg. However, for making the polystyrene cups there is no wood is used, 220 kg of wood is required to make a thousand of paper cups. The use of electricity and petroleum for producing the paper cups is 13 and 3 times higher respectively than the polystyrene cups. While 10 meter cubes of water is needed for producing 1000 of paper cups, the polystyrene cups only required less than 1 meter cube. In contrast, 5 kg more other chemicals is used for the production of polystyrene cups.
- Nowadays families are not as close as in the past and a lot of people have become used to this Explain the reasons for this and discuss any possible effects it may have on society 81
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- In many countries, the amount of crime is increasing. What do you think are the main causes of crime? How can we deal with those causes? 61
- The diagram below shows the percentage of share of total world production of wheat by Asia Europe and other part of the world from the years 1840 to 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where rel 67
- The chart below gives information about birth and death rates in Switzerland from 1970 to 2020 according to United Nations Statistics 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 33.7804878049 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 847.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75842696629 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69871759022 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.455056179775 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.5572396607 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.875 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283371466126 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160326307047 0.103423049105 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621576815257 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228818089795 0.15604864568 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0622870226896 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.03 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.