The best way to improve quality of education is to increase the teachers' salary
Currently, with the advancement of the economy, there is an increasing number of individuals attaching great importance to education. Meanwhile, some citizens propose that the optimal approach to facilitate the quality of education is to increase the salary of teachers. Personally speaking, I cannot concur with the opinion and there are a couple of reasons to account for my view.
To start with, due to the significant development of technology, the cutting-edge pedagogical technologies are playing a vital role in nowadays class. To be more specific, the number of schools furnished with newly-emerging products is ever-rising, meanwhile, the authority is continuously distributing fund to ensure the equipment of pedagogical products. The research conducted to evaluate the quality of education demonstrates that those schools equipped with better-quality teaching assemblies tend to cultivate the students with talents for technology innovations, conversely, although a group of schools allocate a large number of the fund to seek experienced teachers, their quality of schooling turn out to perform poorly.
What’s more, living in the society full of fierce competition, the awareness is of top priority, which indicates that during the development of schools, the conscious they uphold is of dominant significance to win the battle between schools. Since the awareness is the foundation of a school’s advancement, those school without the advanced or competitive awareness cannot get the upper hand during the rival with other schools. For instance, one of my best friends, Rebecca, works as a teacher in a key university. The job is well-paid, however, she felt that although the job is lucrative, the teachers there seem that they cannot enhance the development of this university. As a time-honored university, some notions are entrenched but obsolete, which are no longer suitable for today’s prospects of the tertiary education. Due to the limit of the out-dated awareness, those teachers with the incentives driven by the salaries still cannot enable the advancement of the quality of the tertiary education offered by this school. This example reveals that without a correct notion guiding the right path of development, regarding the salaries as the mere motivator cannot enhance the quality of education.
Admittedly, as the old saying goes, money is and has always been the incentive to drive individuals to work harder, those teachers with higher salaries will work harder to prepare for the class or afford their students with more academic guidance, notwithstanding, the quality of education cannot be facilitated merely with the teachers’ efforts and other aspects of advancement lay a solid foundation of the improvement of education quality, like the right developing notions, well-equipped facilities or other enhancement in pedagogical methods.
In a nutshell, although the increasing salaries are capable of engaging teachers’ enthusiasm for teaching, this cannot boost the development of education. The optimal approach to enhance the quality of education is laying a solid foundation of development through erecting the right developing notions geared toward the competitive environment or allocating more funds to furnish state-of-the-art technology to help teachers enhance their pedagogical methods or efficiency.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-11 | Pham Ngoc Anh | 76 | view |
| 2023-06-30 | AJ720 | 88 | view |
| 2023-06-08 | Vivian Chang | 70 | view |
| 2023-06-08 | Vivian Chang | 70 | view |
| 2023-06-02 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
- Most people can handle problems and difficulties on their own or with the help from their families so there is no need to depend on the government 87
- It is a waste of money for governments fund to space travel or space exploration 64
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is important to know about the events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they affect your daily life. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is difficult for teachers to be both popular ( well-liked ) and effective to help students learning. 90
- Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past that they were nowadays Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 133, Rule ID: IN_NOWADAYS[1]
Message: nowadays is used without 'in'. Use simply: 'nowadays'.
Suggestion: nowadays
...l technologies are playing a vital role in nowadays class. To be more specific, the number ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 620, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...y, although a group of schools allocate a large number of the fund to seek experienced teachers, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, however, if, regarding, so, still, thus, well, while, for instance, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 84.0 52.1666666667 161% => OK
Nominalization: 36.0 8.0752688172 446% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2879.0 1977.66487455 146% => OK
No of words: 503.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72365805169 4.8611393121 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73578520332 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2657208803 2.67179642975 122% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.499005964215 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 903.6 618.680645161 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.1344086022 154% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 113.624381186 48.9658058833 232% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 179.9375 100.406767564 179% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.4375 20.6045352989 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26718714907 0.236089414692 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0884475699234 0.076458572812 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756785688163 0.0737576698707 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15846438003 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475518938906 0.0645574589148 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.2 11.7677419355 180% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.09 58.1214874552 40% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.10430107527 239% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.7 10.1575268817 174% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.49 10.9000537634 151% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.01818996416 124% => OK
difficult_words: 151.0 86.8835125448 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.0537634409 143% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.