Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
“All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is.”
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The context of our modern society has awaken up a question for humans to begin with earnest that whether or not our students are responsible to include history in their courses. Skeptics believe that humans has come to the point when science subjects do get better of social ones. From my point of view, history plays the most critical role in laying the foundation which each individual needs to achieve.
On the one hand, history is the mirror which reflects the whole humans’ lessons throughout the course of time. Indeed, since the dawn of human civilization, our ancestor had an insight that our world was made up of a series of repeating events. Hence, the lack of historical knowledge facilitates the crises caused by historic mistakes to rise up over and over again. For instance, during the dark years of fascism in Germany, fascist authority did allocate an enormous part in national budget to conceal the true history under the mist of pseudo-evidence. As a result, millions of German children had been nourished by a misconception called racism. This crisis do usually appear in the countries in which a dictatorship trying to control its people. Therefore, the coming graduates are in urgent need of to be equipped with history no matter of their majors. This move is to ensure that terrible historic flaws would never be ignited again.
On another aspect, history is a nation’s identity. It is inevitable that our world has stepped inside the globalization process. In this context, independent countries, especially developing countries, are easy to lose its concept of tradition, culture, and standards of moral. In fact, the disappearance of these precious identities could raise the conflicts inside the country itself and the conflicts to the rest of the world. For instance, the constant hostility that lasted for years in Middle East has hamstrung the education of millions of children. The lack of historical skill did weaken their both self-awareness, caused a misconception of blind patriotism, then motivated the enlisting in terrorist organizations at the age of adolescence. At the consequence, the lack of history lessons did erode national identity, did fuel the core reason of almost the conflicts of the world afterwards, especially between the Islamic Nations and the West.
In conclusion, the modern society has blinded people with the dominion of technology over social subjects. The vast majority of us think that history is no longer the main subject. However, I do believe firmly that history is the most critical platform to build the world and schools should take responsibility to include this subject in the course of all area.
- The range of technology available to people is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor. Others think it has an opposite effect. Discuss both views and give your opinions. 73
- Some people believe that the qualities a person needs to become successful in today’s world cannot be learned at a university or similar academic institution. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? "We should always tell the truths". Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
- The best way to reduce youth crime is to educate their parents with parental skills. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?“Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past” 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 39, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'awakened'.
Suggestion: awakened
The context of our modern society has awaken up a question for humans to begin with ...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 98, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...n for humans to begin with earnest that whether or not our students are responsible to include...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 190, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is no longer the main subject. However, I do believe firmly that history is the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, so, then, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 52.1666666667 148% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2254.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 436.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16972477064 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56953094068 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88850264346 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561926605505 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 695.7 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7037386101 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.333333333 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7619047619 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.80952380952 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.85842293907 337% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145996368239 0.236089414692 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0421148376136 0.076458572812 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492950566542 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0904850363849 0.150856017488 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326151345551 0.0645574589148 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 86.8835125448 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.