Which better - buying mostly local food or buying mostly non-local food?
In today's global economy, it is easier for Vietnamese customers to access to a variety of food products imported from different countries such as beef from Australia, apples from US, oranges from Brazil. However, there are some disadvantages related to price, quality of them. One question is posed that which better - buying mostly local food or buying mostly non-local food? In my writing, I will tell three advantages to convince everyone to buy mostly local food.
First of all, it cannot be denied that locally producted food is far cheaper than non-local food. This helps customers can save an amount of money every day. Non - local food products often travel large distances to reach a store. As a result, the price of them is always more expensive than Vietnamese food. An apple, for example, might travel by truck from a farm to packing plant. It might then be exported by plane to Vietnam, than it reaches a store and then, finally, the Vietnamese
Secondly, large distances can impact on the quality of non - local food. For instance, to preserve oranges, suppliers sometimes use chemicals to maintain the freshness of them. It is very harmful for our health. That is the reason why we should believe in the quality of Vietnamese food products.
Last but not least, using mostly local food will promote patriotism, pride of the Vietnamese. It is very meaningful that Vietnamese people believe and buy food products by our own. In addition, this also contributes to increase income of poor people who plant and sell vegetables in the market.
There are three benefits of buying mostly local food. In conclusion, it is better to buy and use Vietnamese food products. However, it cannot be denied the benefits of non- local food. In some case, we should weigh up pros and cons from both.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-24 | kienduc1501 | 96 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 432, Rule ID: COMMA_THAN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'then'?
Suggestion: then
...t then be exported by plane to Vietnam, than it reaches a store and then, finally, t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.48453608247 174% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 4.92783505155 203% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 5.05154639175 139% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.03092783505 198% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 32.9175257732 73% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 26.3917525773 159% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.85567010309 78% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1500.0 937.175257732 160% => OK
No of words: 305.0 206.0 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91803278689 4.54256449028 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 3.78020617076 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52122044621 2.54303337028 99% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 127.690721649 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544262295082 0.622605031667 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 458.1 290.88556701 157% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.13402061856 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 1.44329896907 416% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 12.6804123711 158% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 16.3608247423 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1661524789 44.8134815571 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.0 76.5299724578 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.25 16.8248392259 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85 4.34317383033 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.29896907216 116% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 7.41237113402 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.49484536082 134% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.94845360825 152% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.55300965345 0.216113520407 256% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.187743958781 0.0766984524023 245% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.225455519875 0.0603063233224 374% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.332906314211 0.12726935374 262% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.155515799097 0.0580467560999 268% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 8.37731958763 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 70.7449484536 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 7.45979381443 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.66 8.71597938144 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 7.59969072165 101% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 41.2886597938 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 8.62886597938 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 8.54432989691 94% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 8.15463917526 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.