People think that it’s too late to do anything, while others believe actions can be taken to improve the situations. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It has been an enigmatic quandary as to whether it is too late to preserve the environment. However, it is explicit that people still can improve the environment with effective actions. Although the history and literature are replete with countless examples, the scope and breadth of reckless development and ripple effect of the small initiative are two paragons that reverberate such a view.
A reckless development indubitably demonstrates the matter pertaining to this theme. In modern society, many people have been able to relish much better life due to industrial development. Many convenient facilities and large infrastructures have been built to increase human happiness. However, sadly though, ceaseless constructions of those buildings make irrevocable devastation on the environment. Consequently, some parts of nature are dilapidated entirely with no feasible solutions. That is, it seems like too late to recover the environmental system. However, given that people have been ceaselessly making an effort to conserve our environment until now, I state that it is still not late to return our environment as clean as before.
A ripple effect from small initiative lucidly indicates the issue at hand. People tend to believe that the environment, already terribly damaged, can never be recovered, a common misconception that people hold on the dilapidated environment. However, as a long-run strategy, if trivial activities like recycling waste can be regularly implemented, such misunderstanding can be gradually broken. Even, those trivial activities would bring substantially positive impacts on eco-system, enough to reinvigorate already dead environment. In specific, with the initiation of recycling, the amounts of waste, as well as land contaminants in Seoul, has been significantly dropped, and the destroyed nature consequently has been recovering. Thus, as clearly noted in the case of the ripple effect of the small initiative, one can unambiguously ascertain an epitome that humans are still not too late to save our environment.
At first glance, many often believe that human cannot save our eco-system anymore, but the example of the ripple effect from small initiative coherently prove that protecting the environment is still not too late.
- The table below shows the sales at a small restaurant in a downtown business distrcit. 61
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989. 73
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014. 78
- Some people think that in order to prevent illness and disease, governments should make efforts in reducing environmental pollutions and housing problems. To what extent do you agree to disagree with this statement? 67
- Some people feel that the government should pay the costs of running universities so that a university education will be free for anyone who wants it.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 35, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
It has been an enigmatic quandary as to whether it is too late to preserve the environm...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, so, still, thus, well, as to, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 7.0 257% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 23.0 5.60731707317 410% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 3.97073170732 403% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1938.0 965.302439024 201% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 344.0 196.424390244 175% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63372093023 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 3.73543355544 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2165195222 2.65546596893 121% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 106.607317073 180% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558139534884 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 625.5 283.868780488 220% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 8.94146341463 190% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.99346754 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2352941176 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64705882353 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134870614473 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0443974824236 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453753143625 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0879390752909 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281062606477 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 61.2550243902 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.3012195122 131% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 11.4140731707 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 40.7170731707 253% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.