Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past.
Generally speaking, advancement of science and technology brings many advantages and disadvantages to people all around the world. People's environment is changing rapidly at a very high pace and new innovations are occurring nearly every second. Nothing is happening in the same traditional way. As a consequence, people think everything is changed, even people characteristics and reactions. Some may think nowadays people are less happy than they were before. Others may disagree. In my opinion, people are still happy and get satisfied like they were done in the past years for two reasons.
The first reason why I believe this way is, people are still excited and happy with their lives as before because they are still following and perusing the same old needs and dream that they were following decades and maybe centuries ago. They are still searching for foods to please themselves and fulfill their needs but in totally new ways. For instance, in past, they had to go into the woods with their families to search for foods or even hunt wild animals to eat them. But nowadays they are mostly shopping online for their foods and other needs. Families in the past decades and centuries were living in more crowded families and homes, even sometimes two or three families were living happily together and spent quality times together, but nowadays because of their busy lives and growth of cities they are living apart from each other and it may seem at first that they are more isolated and farther away from each other but in reality, they are still in touch and communicating with each other in new forms. With the advancement of technology, they can easily video call with each other from different zones around the world and still spend happy and quality time together. As you can see people are still happy but with new methods and in different ways.
The second reason why I believe this way is, as the world is changing so rapidly and everything becomes easier for people to achieve. Nowadays they have more things to do and even more time to spend with their family and friends and other loved ones. Outdoor and indoor activities are increasing tremendously. For instance, there are lots of new activities and entertainment ways in new TVs and smartphones that entertain people (Netflix, YouTube, Hulu, and others). Even today some parents are working from home thanks to new ways of remote working via laptops and computers. As a result, they have even more time to spend quality and happy time with their family members.
All in all, though some may disagree with my opinion, people presently are still happy and satisfied with their living style only the ways that lead to that goal is changed. Besides that, there is even more chance and more way for them to become joyful.
- Living with family or independent 88
- Agree or disagree? Parents today are more involved in their children's education than parents were in the past. 73
- Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. 73
- is it good learn foreign language 2 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 359, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
... but in totally new ways. For instance, in past, they had to go into the woods with the...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, may, second, so, still, apart from, even so, for instance, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 40.0 13.8261648746 289% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2325.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 476.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88445378151 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67091256922 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38473696168 2.67179642975 89% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.455882352941 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 724.5 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 86.9301633829 48.9658058833 178% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.681818182 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6363636364 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312838816907 0.236089414692 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0938610596924 0.076458572812 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0785170344238 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202786819266 0.150856017488 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0759739082459 0.0645574589148 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.