Many important discoveries or creations are accidental: it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
When it comes to deciding the origin of important discoveries, people's views are ambivalent. Some contend that they happen mostly by chance, often get redirected to another finding; whilst others believe precisely the opposite. As far as I am concerned, I think it is not so easy to classify any creation from this perspective, for it only accounts for some of the discoveries.
To begin with, the urge from any invention incites from the necessity of the same. Scientists always keep exploring the never ending world of knowledge and on the process of this expedition, they get insight about possible solution of different problems. Even most of the times, the great discoveries of the history of human kind were made from scratch and gradually landed in better versions. For example, the invention of computers- all it started from making a device which namd Abacus, that could be able to count. By the lapse of time, through research and development, we get different generations of computers ranging from the size of a huge room to the recent one of 10 inch! Who could ever think of controlling and completing arduous tasks that used to require a couple of days, can be solved in less than 10 minutes now?
Furthermore, many of the inventions of modern science require stringent processes to go step by step . Researchers have to spend hours to solve a specific problem in order to develop newer versions. It can by no means arise from an arbitrary experiment, designed for another process. For instance, the purification of metals from core.
However, we cannot deny the fact that there are many discoveries that were found accidentally by the discover. Who doesn't know the great Christopher Columbus and his journey to reach India where he ultimately ended up discovering America? Or William Rontgen who was working on a different experiment and invented another completely new types of ray that can pass through our bones. That was unknown to everyone and so he named it X-Ray. There are plenty of examples which lead the scientists or observers to a new paradigm from seeking the answer of another question.
In essence, I agree with this statement, as long as it is not taken to the extreme. We have to admit that some discoveries are accidental, but they are just a portion of the whole, huge world of scientific endeavors.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-25 | batterylow_123 | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | Omar Ibna Nazim | 16 | view |
| 2023-08-02 | okazaki11 | 80 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | jayauen | 83 | view |
| 2023-02-10 | Yam Kumar Oli | 58 | view |
- Arctic deer live on islands in Canada's arctic regions. They search for food by moving over ice from island to island during the course of the year. Their habitat is limited to areas warm enough to sustain the plants on which they feed and cold enoug 53
- The best way to teach — whether as an educator, employer, or parent — is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting y 50
- Many important discoveries or creations are accidental: it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and 79
- Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated.Write a response in which you discuss the e 62
- Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia. Using an observation-centered approach to studying Tertian culture, he concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 354, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...s perspective, for it only accounts for some of the discoveries. To begin with, the urg...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 679, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'inch' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'inches'.
Suggestion: inches
... of a huge room to the recent one of 10 inch! Who could ever think of controlling an...
^^^^
Line 5, column 101, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...e stringent processes to go step by step . Researchers have to spend hours to solv...
^^
Line 7, column 98, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...overies that were found accidentally by the discover. Who doesnt know the great Christopher ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 116, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...found accidentally by the discover. Who doesnt know the great Christopher Columbus and...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 411, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... our bones. That was unknown to everyone and so he named it X-Ray. There are plen...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, so, for example, for instance, i think, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1951.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 396.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92676767677 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76683712928 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593434343434 0.4932671777 120% => OK
syllable_count: 612.9 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3430164318 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.684210526 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8421052632 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42105263158 5.21951772744 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117945634709 0.243740707755 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0349299413002 0.0831039109588 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450081443148 0.0758088955206 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0650156930168 0.150359130593 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413858226847 0.0667264976115 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.