Nowadays, people are affected by Social Media and the Internet, is it a good or bad thing?. Explain by giving examples.
Social Media and Internet are powerful tools used in today's era. Social Media is more than just establishing connections. Differentiating or giving opinion for both depends on user's action or types of usage.
Let's consider a few situations for both the means, in order to describe them as a boon or bane. Firstly, widely used and popular social media platforms cannot function without internet which require quite a lot of user interface and it cannot take place without users engaging themselves into it. Therefore, user action is required along with internet.
Second, if we consider a seldom occurring situation where some social portals function without internet, those make it even more clear as to why the affect purely depends on user activity and not on Internet and Social Media
Also, one cannot connect with people staying at faraway places without internet which also makes them a victim of hypertension, addict of virtual world or even depression. In the contemporary era. The advancement of Technology has brought in various pros and cons, where people at times miss out on real interactions
However, in conclusion the Internet and the social media have a significant effect on people, some of them affect positively and other ones affect negatively. Social Media or Internet both require user input without which none can function. If put to correct use, social media provides a great platform for network building, marketing along with helping in professional growth. Internet being a global tool for usage of promotion helps user fulfill their need according to the demand. The affect depends entirely on usage and user's action.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-11 | vishrattan | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 177, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'users'' or 'user's'?
Suggestion: users'; user's
...g or giving opinion for both depends on users action or types of usage. Lets consi...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...s on users action or types of usage. Lets consider a few situations for both the ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, second, so, therefore, as to, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1391.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22932330827 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6377076861 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586466165414 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 103.243436114 49.4020404114 209% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 107.0 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4615384615 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242913328796 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0906924139026 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622905032709 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149225955935 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0596763777638 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.