The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range fore the year 1990 and 2010.
The bar chart illustrates the proportion of British people in different age groups who gave money to charity in 1990 and 2010.
As we can see in the chart, people aged between 18 to 25 had the lowest percentage in both years, although the number dropped by almost 10% in 2010.
People aged between 36 to 50 had the highest percentage of give away with more than 40%. The number lowered to 35% in 2010.Between age 51 to 65 had the highest donation in 2010 with 40% which showed a 5% increase from this age range in 1990.
26 to 35 year olds were ranked second least in both years (they only donated more than 18-26 year olds). their numbers dropped from more than 30% in 1990 to less than 25% in 2010.
People older than 65 were ranked third in 1990 with more than 30% . They had a slight increase to 35%, only behind 51-65 age range and equal to 36-50 year olds.
- some young people look forward to a year of traveling, a gap year, before they begin work or university and see a chance to broaden their horizons. for others this is an expensive waste of time. discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- the flow chart shows trampling the negative effect of tourist walking in the countryside for the environment 40
- The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- some people work for the same organisations all their work life. other think that it is better to work for different organisations. 56
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range fore the year 1990 and 2010. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 124, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Between
... 40%. The number lowered to 35% in 2010.Between age 51 to 65 had the highest donation i...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 243, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...% increase from this age range in 1990. 26 to 35 year olds were ranked second le...
^^^
Line 5, column 104, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Their
...only donated more than 18-26 year olds. their numbers dropped from more than 30% in 1...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 66, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... ranked third in 1990 with more than 30% . They had a slight increase to 35%, only...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 702.0 965.302439024 73% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.28048780488 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.04464405941 2.65546596893 77% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573170731707 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 184.5 283.868780488 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.1 1.45097560976 76% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.3333047161 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.75 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.125 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314756957213 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143220812758 0.103423049105 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0819851611767 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184524384326 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0834958128478 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.2329268293 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 93.48 61.2550243902 153% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.54 11.4140731707 66% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.46 8.06136585366 80% => OK
difficult_words: 19.0 40.7170731707 47% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.