There is an increasing trend around the world to have a small family rather than a large family. What are some of the advantages and disadvantages of having a small family rather than a large family?
Recently, the phenomenon of climate change and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the significance of complex procedure is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroghly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number individuals. I am inclined to believe that pollution of area can be a plus and I will analyze that through this essay.
From a general standpoint, rising population can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in fact that economic benefits, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an acadmic experiment which discovered small family. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both decreasing number of large family and big family apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, field of study might increase the consequences of sociology effects. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with poor family. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of orphen children.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I perfoundly believe that the benefits of public training far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this increasing number of small family prove the significane of wealth community, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in future. Do you agree or disagree? 11
- The world is becoming a smaller place because of globalization. Some people dread that culture will inevitably disappear as a result. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in future. Do you agree or disagree? 88
- Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping, etc. and whether you support them or not. 11
- Imitating celebrities in sports and movies good or bad? do you agree? 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 226, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ersity has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negativ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, in fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1323.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 236.0 242.827586207 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60593220339 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16078690034 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.694915254237 0.580463131201 120% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8474132994 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.272727273 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4545454545 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.18181818182 7.25397266985 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173802073305 0.242375264174 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0521495594873 0.0925447433944 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640872361306 0.071462118173 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0862141728516 0.151781067708 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0557310555663 0.0609392437508 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 12.6369458128 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 11.5310837438 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.9 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 55.0591133005 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.