The people who do not recycle their wastage, government should take action against them. It right or wrong.
Environment around us constitutes of those factors which influence the survival living beings, like human, flora and fauna. While pollution affect on those factors so some people think that we should recycle the waste and they said government should take action against the people who are not recycling their wastage. I am agree with this statement and i will discuss should laws be needed for recycling in upcoming paragraphs.
To begin with, if government will make the legal requirements for recycling the wastage, then it is beneficial for those products which have reached on the scarcity rate, like water is decreasing into the earth, so if we use the rainy water then to some extent water can be saved. Moreover, people can save their some money by recycling the products.
Apart from this, we can also decrease the pollution by recycling the products, like sometime we throw some things outside, which can be used again. Besides this, if we will recycle the products then we can keep our around neat and clean. After that, if people will save their money by recycling, then their offspring can learn many things from their parents and they can achieve better education in the schools.
In conclusion, it can be said that recycling of products is very beneficial for people, because if any source will be demolished from the earth, then our existence will be threatened.
- What do you think about our environment considering the fact that there has been steady increase in pollution and affects like global warming are increasing as time is passing by? Are we under jeopardy? Is the humanity safe? 61
- The world has become smaller place because of globalization some people dread that inevitably the culture will be disappeared as a result To some extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 62
- Should animals be kept in zoos or are they better in living in their natural habitant 72
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this practice? 88
- As global trade increases many daily necessities are produced in other countries. Is it a good or bad trend? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 23, Rule ID: CONSTITUTES_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'consists of'?
Suggestion: consists of
Environment around us constitutes of those factors which influence the survi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 141, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...human, flora and fauna. While pollution affect on those factors so some people think that...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 324, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
...o are not recycling their wastage. I am agree with this statement and i will discus...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 349, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... wastage. I am agree with this statement and i will discuss should laws be neede...
^^
Line 1, column 354, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...age. I am agree with this statement and i will discuss should laws be needed for...
^^
Line 1, column 356, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...e. I am agree with this statement and i will discuss should laws be needed for ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, moreover, so, then, while, apart from, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 6.10837438424 278% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 20.9802955665 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1151.0 1207.87684729 95% => OK
No of words: 232.0 242.827586207 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96120689655 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46680925274 2.71678728327 91% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 139.433497537 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543103448276 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 348.3 379.143842365 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.71428571429 350% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.65517241379 219% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.4354568481 50.4703680194 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.888888889 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7777777778 20.9669160288 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.55555555556 7.25397266985 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.33497536946 112% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213855273172 0.242375264174 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106670365332 0.0925447433944 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136240708289 0.071462118173 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138946472166 0.151781067708 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114828563936 0.0609392437508 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 12.6369458128 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.1260098522 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.5310837438 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.32886699507 99% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 55.0591133005 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.94827586207 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.