New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Researchers have found that children spend more of their time online than with their families or in the real world.
With new and improved technology it has shaped the way we spend our free time, especially with children. Young adults are seen as the most who use the internet and are always up to date with new technology, this has started to bring attention to if kids as well are not using their free time accurately and for good use. Although there are many advantages to this problem e.g the internet is very educational if used correctly and can also be used for entertainment purposes if not overused. The disadvantages are way more and outweigh the advantages, therefore I disagree with the statement above. Aside from children in specific and focusing more on people as a whole, adults as well have used technology in a way that they started decreasing their free time in participating in other activities such as reading or exercising. Instead, they spend their time online or using technology. Playing a reason new technology is affecting the social aspect of our lives, people have started to become less social. In outdoor or family activities each person is sitting on their phones not paying attention to the other person creating a tension this has made new technology bad than good. Addiction to it leads to children not being able to focus in class and in their education, as well as disconnects them from the social world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 117, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...th their families or in the real world. With new and improved technology it has ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, therefore, well, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1205.0 1615.20841683 75% => OK
No of words: 248.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85887096774 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65950269873 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 176.041082164 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536290322581 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 380.7 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7433739517 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.5 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.38176352705 46% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375972811362 0.244688304435 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151329198868 0.084324248473 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0824632075337 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.297260514484 0.151304729494 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496500274491 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.