Some universities offer online courses as an alternative to classes delivered on campus. Do you think it is a positive or negative development.
Nowadays, distance learning has been considered a replacement for offline learning in many universities. From my standing point, this is an essential development in technological era, however, teacher-led lessons should not be completely superseded by online courses.
On the one hand, online learning provides students with a lot of benefits, especially those who stay away from schools. Firstly, people who are unable to enroll in universities because of long distance find it easier to study online by accessing the internet. They can download podcasts or documents for learning purposes without travelling across the world. Secondly, students who study online are not imposed discipline, so that they find it free and not stressful while studying. As a result, they can easily choose the lessons which are not out of their depth and study at any time flexibly.
On the other hand, face-to-face learning brings students many advantages which are not parts of distance learning. First of all, real interacts between students and their teachers and peers helps them to develop their networks and get more job opportunities. Therefore, after traditional courses, students will have more social relationships wich can support them in their further education or career path. Furthermore, offline learning makes students have a good grasp of the subjects. Because at schools, there are various pedagogical experts who always try to tailor teaching styles, students can study under supervision and assimilate knowledge better.
All in all, I argue that online learning and campus learning are equally important, and every one of them should not be totally replaced by its counterpart, even during technological revolutions
- It is neither possible nor useful for a country to provide university places for a high proportion of young people. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 67
- With the rapid advancement of cummunication technology, eg smart phones, tablets, and other mobile devices, some people believe that the disadvantages outweigh the advantages. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- International travel has many advantages to both travelers and the country visited. Do you think advantages outweigh disadvantages. 84
- Changes in UK birth rate 73
- The online shopping sales for retail sectors 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 62, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arning has been considered a replacement for offline learning in many universitie...
^^
Line 5, column 329, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'relationships'' or 'relationship's'?
Suggestion: relationships'; relationship's
...courses, students will have more social relationships wich can support them in their further ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1466.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55303030303 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90245455162 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636363636364 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5902486686 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.769230769 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3076923077 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.38461538462 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0525081045092 0.244688304435 21% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0192013270191 0.084324248473 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0258567414441 0.0667982634062 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0377361984885 0.151304729494 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0219334716117 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.