the chart below shows the percentage of difference in income between men and women from 1978 to 2008. summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart illustrates the proportion of difference in income between genders in five developed countries over a course of 30 years starting in 1978
Overall, it is clear that there was a stable reduction in the percentage of income gap between men and women almost through the period shown. The figure for Australia was an exception, rose significantly from 1998 to 2008.
In 1978, Japan registered the highest proportion at nearly 50% difference in income between genders. The figure for America was lower at about 34%. There was a decreasing trend in both nations. The percentage gap between both genders in Japan and USA was 40% and 28% respectively by 2008.
The proportion gap between genders in the UK and France also witnessed a slight decrease throughout the course. Around 30% of the figure for the UK, compared to about 20% for France at the start of the period, then the figure for two countries declined gradually at 26% in the UK and 18% in France by 2008. By contrast, the percentage of difference in income between man and women in Australia fell at 8% in 1998 before raising drastically, overtaking the figure for France and reaching its peak at 24% at the end of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-20 | Bùi Minh Châu | 67 | view |
- In some countries, some high school leavers are choosing to work or travel for a period before going to university. Discuss advantages and disadvantages of those school leavers’ decision. Give your opinion. 73
- the chart below shows the percentage of difference in income between men and women from 1978 to 2008. summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The graph below shows the average time spent by four car manufacturers to produce vehicles at their US factories 84
- Consumption of Fast Food in the UK 79
- Early technological developments brought more benefits and changes to people’s life than the recent technological developments. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 990.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78260869565 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69498545943 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507246376812 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.7924777543 43.030603864 185% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174210516509 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0773202806149 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0708492322052 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128780492861 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359984282019 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.