The tables below show the value of Australia's trade with China, the USA and Japan from 2012-2015 in billions of Australian dollars.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The tables depict the four-year trade values made between Australia and three other countries namely, China, the United States and Japan. The units are measured in Australian dollars.
The imports made with China fluctuated markedly while the exports steadily decreased by the end of the period. The imports began at $2.75 billion in 2012 and peaked at $4 billion in 2013. The trade severely declined at $1.75 billion in the year 2014 only to regain $1 billion by 2015. Meanwhile, exports substantially experienced a loss of $2 billion. It started at $4.74 billion decreasing slightly year after year until it reached only $2.75 billion.
When it comes to the United States, both the imports and exports made in four years declined consistently. Initially, $7 billion worth of imports were collected in 2012. The downward trajectory went on with the succeeding years until it ended at only $4.75 billion. In a similar way, exports started with $3.75 billion in 2012 and plateaued in 2013. The trade value fell marginally after a year and settled at $3 billion by the end of the period.
Imports made with Japan increased overall at end of the period whilst the exports had a gradual and steady fall. In 2012, $4.25 billion worth of imports were accumulated. It fell slightly by $ 0.5 the following year but regained and topped the value with $5.75 billion in 2 years straight. In contrast, the exports had a total loss of $1.25 billion, from $2.75 billion in 2012 to only $1.5 billion in 2015.
- The graph above shows the stock price of four technology companies between 2011 and 2016 77
- The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- Digital communication technology, such as email, instant messaging and social media, has improved communication and cinnections between people.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opipnion.Give reasons for your answer and include examples fro 73
- The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015 81
- The tables below show the value of Australia's trade with China, the USA and Japan from 2012-2015 in billions of Australian dollars. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... are measured in Australian dollars. The imports made with China fluctuated mark...
^^^
Line 3, column 112, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ily decreased by the end of the period. The imports began at .75 billion in 2012 an...
^^^
Line 3, column 166, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gan at .75 billion in 2012 and peaked at billion in 2013. The trade severely decl...
^^
Line 3, column 168, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...n at .75 billion in 2012 and peaked at billion in 2013. The trade severely declined at...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 185, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...in 2012 and peaked at billion in 2013. The trade severely declined at .75 billion ...
^^^
Line 3, column 259, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... billion in the year 2014 only to regain billion by 2015. Meanwhile, exports subs...
^^
Line 3, column 261, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...illion in the year 2014 only to regain billion by 2015. Meanwhile, exports substantial...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 332, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...orts substantially experienced a loss of billion. It started at .74 billion, decr...
^^
Line 5, column 36, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... When it comes to the United States, both the imports and exports made in fou...
^^
Line 5, column 120, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...years declined consistently. Initially, billion worth of imports were collected ...
^^
Line 5, column 122, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...ars declined consistently. Initially, billion worth of imports were collected in 2012...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 265, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "In a similar way" with adverb for "similar"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ars until it ended at only .75 billion. In a similar way, exports started with .75 billion in 20...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 406, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l marginally after a year and settled at billion by the end of the period. Imp...
^^
Line 5, column 408, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...marginally after a year and settled at billion by the end of the period. Imports ma...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 186, Rule ID: CURRENCY_SPACE[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually written without any whitespace: '$0'.
Suggestion: $0
...s were accumulated. It fell slightly by $ 0.5 the following year but regained and t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1214.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 247.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91497975709 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5065860179 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477732793522 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 339.3 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.4284670006 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.875 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4375 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.4375 5.23603664747 27% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 15.0 1.69756097561 884% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199304978106 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.085186059935 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0414958806012 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151526096668 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0306764274875 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.