TPO 31
In the preceding decades, the world has changed so rapidly which makes our lives incomparable with our ancestors. The ever-increasing prominence of technology has aroused the long-lasting controversy whether people tend to be more satisfied nowadays or our parents in the past. Although many people adhere to the idea that modern people sense the mitigation of happiness, I resolutely possess the conviction that the more the world develops, the more the people satisfied. In the following paragraphs, the most outstanding reasons will be explicated.
The first reason that supports my perspective is concerned with the fact that the trail of technological development provides a convenient lifestyle. While in the past people had to do tough jobs to meet their needs, the appearance of modern tools and inventions prepare the conditions of doing them without difficulties. In fact, we can easily go around by car or train which was troublesome years ago or use cell phones which were dreams for our predecessors. As a rule, had not the technology developed, we would have to experience the difficulties our as our grandparents.
Another noteworthy point to be mentioned is that we are not in battle with diseases anymore. Indeed, had the world not been ameliorated, we would have been the witness of perishing millions of people each year. These changes not only made our life level much better but also helped us to dominate the natural forces. For instance, many parents had been losing their children in the last centuries since they had not had the appropriate level of life as well as little knowledge and facilities to deal with illnesses.
In brief, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that living in this period of time is more cheering rather than past. Since nowadays all the technologies are in our control to make our lives as comfortable as possible and turn us to the dominant creature of the world which can defeat natural powers like illnesses.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In the preceding decades, the world has ...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ifficulties our as our grandparents. Another noteworthy point to be mentioned...
^^
Line 7, column 103, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...s to the conclusion that living in this period of time is more cheering rather than past. Sinc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, well, while, for instance, in brief, in fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1680.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 328.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12195121951 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96829744273 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573170731707 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4720943128 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.