the line graph gives information on cinema attendance in the UK
The line graph compare how many people went to the movie theater in the UK base on four groups from 14 to 5 between 1990 and 2010.
It is clean that the attendance in cinema increased over the period shown. Especially, the younger people active in movie going than the older people. Exceptionally, for a drop slightly from 1995 to 2000.
By the year 1990, the highest viewer was about 39 percent of 14 to 24 aged and the lowest was 15 percent in 44 to 54 aged. Following five years between 1995 and 2000, there was a peaked the bottom of all figure's aged.
Over a five-year period from 2005 to 2010, the youngest group watched film in cinema rose at 51 percent by the most important, while the percentage of 24 to 34 aged also went up. However, both groups 34 to 44 aged and 44 to 54 aged had remained stable trend in about 30 percent.
- the table shows the monthly expenditures of an average Australian family from 1991 to 2001 56
- the table shows the monthly expenditures of an average Australian family from 1991 to 2001 56
- The table below show the percentage of female workforce and female managers in five countries 88
- the line graph gives information on cinema attendance in the UK 56
- People now have the freedom to work and live anywhere in the world due to the development of communication technology and transportation Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 680.0 965.302439024 70% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.27672955975 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26112656147 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.622641509434 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 189.9 283.868780488 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.9744421865 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.0 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101139897288 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0458450044592 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692725057639 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0684282568551 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612924777121 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.2329268293 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 86.03 61.2550243902 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.54 11.4140731707 66% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.