TPO 7, Integrated task writing
In the reading passage, the arguer mentions that there are three major factors increasing the possibility that the American customers buy the ecocertified wood products: firstly, they cannot trust in advertising claims, they prefer purchasing the low-price products, and finally, they are the biggest consumers of such products. Although the author buttresses the ideas in the reading section, the lecturer repudiates them.
Firstly, on the one hand, the author mentions that the American consumers are steeped in so much advertising and indeed, they would not pay attention to the novel or Eco-certificated labels; however, the lecturer posits that the people distinguish fairly between different products. In fact, they react fairly to the international or indigenous corporations’ advertisings. Thus, it seems the consumers pay attention to the advertising’s contents.
Secondly, even though the author holds that the ecocertified woods will be more expensive than the ordinary products and as a result, the American consumers tend to buy low-price products instead of them, the lecture refutes this idea. He claims that, according to the various studies, American customers pay attention to the quality and other related characteristics as well as the price. Therefore, the price could not take a center stage in convincing consumers to buy the products.
Last but not least, the author declares that the American consumers are the big group of customers in ecocertified products. In other words, American wood companies sell lion’s share of their products in the United States. On the other hand, according to the lecture section, the lecturer rejects this claims because he believes that if American companies do not apply the ecocertified labels, many international companies will take the local businesses in future. Hence, to compete with other international companies, American companies should take the ecocertified concept.
In conclusion, whereas the author supports the opinions about the complicity of major factors in ecocertification and business, the lecturer repudiates these factors in the listening section.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-27 | Ehsan Razmara | 3 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support. 73
- People’s lives are becoming increasing stressful nowadays and there are many reasons behind this. Many people relate this to the technological advancement while others say that high living costs and competitions are the main reasons for this stressful l 100
- It's generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for music and sport, and others are not. However, it's sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician.Discuss both id 73
- In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than they have now.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 460, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ompanies will take the local businesses in future. Hence, to compete with other internati...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, as well as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1832.0 1373.03311258 133% => OK
No of words: 320.0 270.72406181 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.725 5.08290768461 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14083488105 2.5805825403 122% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50625 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 559.8 419.366225166 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 2.5761589404 349% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.8821617341 49.2860985944 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.923076923 110.228320801 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6153846154 21.698381199 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.3076923077 7.06452816374 203% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.3589403974 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.8541721854 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 12.2367328918 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 63.6247240618 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 10.7273730684 182% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.