People naturally resist making changes in their lives.
What kind of problem can this cause? What solutions can you suggest?
It is the nature of human, if they feel severe to embrace the changing who comes to their life. In term of work, this reason raises the main problem of losing jobs for worker and the most practical solution is a public campaign about the revolution urgency.
The primary problem associated with resisting embracing the changes of entire life is people would lose their income. The existing of online transportation tends to shift an exist conventional one. This led the earning of the people who work in conventional approach decreases which triggers financial disturbance in the family. For example, since 2016, the incomes of 68% Indonesian taxi driver offline have declined because customers prefer to use online vehicle. If those still stick on in conventional way, it will add the number of poverty.
The most effective solution to this issue is release a campaign about the revolution urgency. Majority people refuse the changing in the life because they feel frightened and they do not want to take a risk. They show what they work is the convenience job. Schools, social media, TV and others can be used as media to deliver the knowledge about what people should do to deal with the revolution. United Kingdom is the main leading country which has applied this initiative since 1990. United Kingdom government has launched the campaign to the people to play role in the world-changing. This results in United Kingdom people becoming more confident to embrace the revolution.
In conclusion, most of the people are unwilling to change their daily basis activity including in work life. Losing their job is main problem which comes up and spreading positive campaign about the essential of life changing is the best solution.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-27 | LilyPotter | 73 | view |
| 2018-11-25 | Fatih88 | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 172, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...of online transportation tends to shift an exist conventional one. This led the earning ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... life changing is the best solution.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, still, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1462.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09407665505 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62846205632 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547038327526 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.0122043715 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.375 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9375 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5625 7.06120827912 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228808892068 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0684196706085 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465252556661 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131792239918 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0277756882172 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.