The environment we are living in is in danger due to various problems. What are the underlying causes? Who do you think should be responsible to solve it? Is it the governments, organization or each individual?
Recently, the phenomenon of the environment we are living in and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that greenhouse gases can be a plus, and I will discuss causes and solutions of that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, greenhouse gases can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of complex issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. As per my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus beneficial ramifications of both this remarkable phenomenon and complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, the government might increase the consequences of critical needs. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of the faulty system could relate to this reality that the demerits of unnecessary usages pertain to health problems. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is negatively correlated with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this common phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the government far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes but also pinpoint social implications
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-27 | davood mohammadi | 11 | view |
| 2019-05-12 | namdevjd1 | 75 | view |
| 2019-01-19 | lalacamargo1 | 88 | view |
| 2018-12-28 | dhavalpatel095 | 85 | view |
| 2018-12-28 | dhavalpatel095 | 11 | view |
- medical technology is responsible for the human's life expectancy. to what extent do u agree or disagree? 88
- should government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner to improve the networks of public transport? 85
- Younger employees have more skills, knowledge and more motivated than older employees. To what extent do you agree or disagree, support your argument with your own experience? 85
- should government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner to improve the networks of public transport? 85
- cities are now expanding; the government should make better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership? agree or disagree? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 347, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ment which discovered current policies. Thus beneficial ramifications of both this r...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1462.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 261.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60153256705 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1902896519 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651340996169 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.71428571429 350% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1236110858 50.4703680194 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.833333333 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0604488244698 0.242375264174 25% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0214092465563 0.0925447433944 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0322071138342 0.071462118173 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0348007968322 0.151781067708 23% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313017276876 0.0609392437508 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 12.6369458128 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 11.5310837438 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.97 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.