People today are selfish and greedy. They think only about improving their own lives rather than others in the society. Do you agree?
Undeniably, modernization has tremendously affected the people’s lifestyles in our contemporary world. Making decision alone, humans do not value others’ opinions, although this method of living might have had some positive influences. I personally think that its advantages have been less notable than the traditional one.
Now, many individuals prefer to act solely than the past, leading them to succeed in their life more than before. One important benefit is that they have a better independent lifestyle. The more they live without their parents’ assistance, the more they feel more confidence. This means, selfishness has led young to have more independence when it comes to the selection of his or her study subject, while they were more under control of their parents in this matter before. In addition, this has led citizens to become more successful in their business. Craving to save more money, businesspersons compete more with their rivals and produce more highly quality products. For instance, the owner of Apple, a well-known cell phone company in the USA, has had a significant prosperous business by 2014. To compete with other rivals, he decided to raise its profit by producing of watch cell phones and surpassed other rivals. As a result, his greedy decision has led people to have a different cell phone, and the owner earned more profit.
In contrast, considering traditions can be more helpful in any aspect of life, and I agree with this view. One important factor is that the rate of crime can be decreased far dramatically. Unfortunately, to make more profit, individuals follow rules less than before, and fraud rates have more considerably pulled up. However, had they considered the moral aspects being valued in the past, they would not have crossed the line. Another factor is that emotionally people will have a better supportive condition. Clearly, traditions induce citizens to support their relatives or friends. For example, a bankrupted retailer might be helped by his family before due to the traditions people had in the past, while this has remarkably become forgotten.
In conclusion, humans have become less dependent on their family and community. I personally believe that the benefits earned by this method of living have become less obvious than the traditional one our ancestors had. I personally believe that not only the rate of violence will decrease, but people will be backed up by each other emotionally.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-29 | tahmeed1993 | 73 | view |
- Government should spend more on science and research rather than economic or arts sectors To what extent do you agree 84
- Parents also should be punished or not for bad behaviour for children What is your opinion 73
- You celebrated your birthday with some friends last week in a restaurant It was a great success and you and your friends enjoyed the evening very much Write a letter to the restaurant to Thank them Mention the food service and the atmosphere Suggest any i 89
- Much of the information that people assume is 'factual' actually turns out to be inaccurate. Thus, any piece of information referred to as a 'fact' should be mistrusted since it may well be proven false in the future. 83
- Foreigners should pay for visiting local historical and cultural attractions Do you agree or disagree 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 24.0651302605 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2088.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 397.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25944584383 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8559633391 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546599496222 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 670.5 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.2619759778 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.9090909091 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0454545455 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.18181818182 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160380351591 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0497229501459 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.028541598423 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104324113166 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0183528400945 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.