Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The issue of whether or not authorities should protect wildlife has grown in importance over the past few decades. Some people are of the view that resources would be wasted if the investment is allocated this purpose in the 21st century. I completely disagree with this opinion, and I will provide evidence in this essay as to why preserving wild animals is superior.
There is no doubt that wild animals like other creatures entitle to exist. So that, it is unequitable to destroy their habitat for spreading human's territory. In addition, destroying their habitat not only do they expose to danger but also the survival of human would be jeopardized. For instance, logging and destruction rainforest has endangered many species of animals, and it leads to dwelling oxygen resources and exacerbation of global warming in the world. As a result, the human environment would encounter many challenges without preserving wildlife habitat.
Furthermore, it seems that protecteion wildlife has brought benefits rather than waste of money and time. These animals play an essential role in balancing the ecosystem particularly in food chain. Consequently, any disruption in food chain has a detrimental impact on human living. For example, there are several wild species that consume rats in farms so that protect farms from damaging. Moreover, these animals give individuals opportunities to do research. Many researches in the world have shown that most of these animals have special chemical substance to protect their body from cancer.
However, it may be correct to say that to preserve some species like endangered should be spent huge amount of resources in forms of human, time and money it must be said that the maintaining biodiversity is worth. Because the biodiversity is of the main factor to survive the biosphere.
Overall, it can be said that it is the certain right of wild animals to live and preserving them have advantages in terms of balancing the ecosystem and doing research. Personally, I believe that governments have to allocate investment in protecting them.
- Some people get into debt by buying things they don’t need and can’t afford. What are the reasons for this behaviour? What action can be taken to prevent people from having this problem? 78
- using advanced technology in agriculture such as chemical fertilizers and machinery has resulted in producing more food. some people, however, think these technologies have negative effects. what are the advantages and this advantages/ 78
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their w 56
- Some people get into debt by buying things they don’t need and can’t afford. What are the reasons for this behaviour? What action can be taken to prevent people from having this problem? 73
- the majority of children are raised by their grandparents due to the fact that their parents are busy working. is this positive or negative development? why? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 14, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
The issue of whether or not authorities should protect wildlife has...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 141, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
... to destroy their habitat for spreading humans territory. In addition, destroying thei...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 215, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... the maintaining biodiversity is worth. Because the biodiversity is of the main factor ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, in fact, no doubt, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1756.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24179104478 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8805057599 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570149253731 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4637475624 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5555555556 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6111111111 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220586385766 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0639246248592 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553406066658 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117035004194 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0739867280299 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.