Some people think that the newly built houses should follow the styles of the old houses in the local areas, while others think that people should have freedom to build houses of their own styles. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It has become a noticeable controversy when people arguing towards the selection of new houses’ architectural styles in the locality where traditional houses are existing. At the outset, it is widely believed by many that all new residential houses must obey exactly the way old houses were constructed to maintain cultural heritage. However, I am of the opinion that new house’s owners should be encouraged to freely design their own houses because of enhancement of houses’ performances during operation.
On the one hand, the idea of forcing new houses’ builders to obey long-establish houses’ appearances is believed by many because the cultural values of local areas that have been represented in house construction. Firstly, if the new houses, that are designed with bright-color facades, appear in the middle of conventional structures, the whole beauty of house arrangement will be destroyed. Consequently, it is hard to find out the original cultural value in the areas. As an illustration, because the “Hoi An” town, a well-known and cultural tourism place in Vietnam, has been fulfilled with modern houses, its reputation for cultural unique has been vanished.
However, I am in favour of the idea that landlords ought to be free to build their houses because of significant benefits from material development that enhances house’s efficiency. It is obvious that advanced materials being applied nowadays in modern houses are more durable and sustainable compared those in the old houses. As a result, it may not only diminish the maintenance cost and energy consumption, but it may also lengthen the service life of houses. For example, more durable and environment friendly roof tiles should be used to replace the heavy concrete tiles to reduce 50% of energy consumed in the summer and increase lifetime by 50 years.
In conclusion, maintaining the old-established house styles is the conservative idea of some in order to preserve heritage. Nevertheless, my stance is that it is better to promote new house styles as a consequence of material production progress.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-10 | nguyenduchuy2705 | 61 | view |
| 2019-06-27 | minhanh2410 | 73 | view |
| 2019-01-14 | huathibichngoc.c3.ltt@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2019-01-04 | NamVu | 84 | view |
- Parent often give children everything they ask for and do what they like. Is it good for children? What are the consequences when they grow up? 67
- Some people believe that famous people’s support towards international aid organisations draw attention to problems and contribute significantly for their achievements. Do you agree or disagree? 93
- Some people think that the newly built houses should follow the styles of the old houses in the local areas, while others think that people should have freedom to build houses of their own styles. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 84
- In the modern world, it is possible to shop, work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face-to-face contact with others. Is this a positive or negative development 100
- You have just received a credit card statement from your bank. The statement lists a number of expensive purchases that you are sure you did not make.Write a letter to the bank manager. In the letter:• Introduce yourself.• Explain that you did not buy 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, then, well, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1793.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.416918429 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18462251112 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574018126888 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 574.2 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.1538461538 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.923076923 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4615384615 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.84615384615 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271414948265 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102458061009 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0768592354798 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173648502255 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0783191161559 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.