As people rely more and more on technology to solve problmes, the ability of humans to think themselves will surely deteriorate.
In the twenty-first century, we are surrounded by various technologies. There is no doubt technology allow us to develop ourselves and also allow us to understand nature in a better way than before. Development in medical technology allows doctors to cure decease which was impossible to cure in past. Development in space technology allows scientist to study extra-terrestrial object and planets of solar system. Thus, technology makes our life more comfortable than before. Though there are some side effects as people rely excessively on technology, I disagree with the statement that as people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think will deteriorate.
As people rely more and more on technology in their day to day life they will become lazy and over the period of time, their thinking capability will also reduce. For example, before the invention of calculator people can calculate multiplication, division, addition, subtraction, the percentage with their mental capabilities. On the other hand, today as people rely on a calculator for small calculation, their mental calculation will surely deteriorate. When there were no smartphones everyone has to remember telephone number as landline phone did not allow to store the telephone number. But today people find difficult to remember a couple of telephone number.
Though there are some case-studies which warn people about the deteriorating effects of technology, there are numbers of example which suggest that use of technology allow us more time to increase productivity. Use of machines in the factory has improved not only quality and accuracy but also increased productivity. It is well-known that Mr. Henry Ford's invention of assembly-line in the production of the car has allowed automobile industries to produce more cars to compete with the demand in the market.
Use of technology provides an additional time that scientists and experts utilize for more scientific discoveries and research work. Development in technology has allowed scientists to check their theoretical work by performing experiment and observations. Thus, it would be wrong to conclude that use of technology to solve problems will surely deteriorate thinking capacity.
In sum, I agree that technology is a two-edged sword which can both increase or decrease thinking capabilities. Ultimately, it depends on people what they do with their additional time provided by using technology. Thus, it would be unjust to say that as people use more and more technology, their creative and imaginary capability will deteriorate.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-06 | Patel krinal | 66 | view |
- Scientists and other researchers should focus their on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people 50
- "Of the two leading real estate firms in our town — Adams Realty and Fitch Realty — Adams Realty is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents; in contrast, Fitch has 25, many of whom work only part-time. Moreover, Adams' revenue last 50
- The following appeared as part of a letter to the editor of a scientific journal."A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual's levels of stimulation. The study showed that in stimul 23
- According to a recent report by our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies act 29
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In the twenty-first century, we are surr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 315, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...re decease which was impossible to cure in past. Development in space technology allows...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 195, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...life they will become lazy and over the period of time, their thinking capability will also re...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 654, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'storing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: storing
... number as landline phone did not allow to store the telephone number. But today people ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, thus, well, as to, for example, no doubt, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2623.0 2235.4752809 117% => OK
No of words: 415.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.32048192771 5.05705443957 125% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 8.84282195188 2.79657885939 316% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 205.0 215.323595506 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493975903614 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 730.8 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.4165351443 60.3974514979 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.15 118.986275619 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.21951772744 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144443576252 0.243740707755 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0882909453694 0.0831039109588 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124726780341 0.0758088955206 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134740269367 0.150359130593 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0992806151331 0.0667264976115 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 14.1392134831 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 48.8420337079 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 12.1743820225 111% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 19.38 12.1639044944 159% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.7820224719 161% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.