The should below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
These two tables illustrate how many Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas were sold in 1999 and 2004. Units are measured in millions of euros.
Overall, the sales of coffee had increased in these four countries (UK, Switzerland, Belgium, and Sweden) but in Denmark, it went down a little. Regarding the sales of bananas, all countries except Sweden experienced an increase in bananas sale.
First of all, when taking a look further, we can see that sales of coffee in UK increased significantly from 1.5 million in 1999 to 20 million in 2004 which is more than 10 times and Sweden's coffee sale only went up 0.2 which is the least from 1999 to 2004. On the other hand, coffee sales in Denmark slipped down a little from 1.8 million in 1999 to 2 million in 2004.
Next, there is a similar trend in bananas sales of these five countries which means only one country experienced a drop of bananas sale. Switzerland's bananas sale almost tripled from 1999 to 2004 and that of Belgium even increased 7 times while Sweden's bananas sale went down from 1.8 million in 1999 to 1 million in 2004.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | Pham Mai Nguyet | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | el-naz | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-08 | Sri Wahyuningsih | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-31 | Sonya Hsieh | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-10 | Tran Mai Phuong | 84 | view |
- The should below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon. 67
- The should below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years. 73
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, regarding, so, while, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 903.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.703125 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58475578278 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53125 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.5628547461 43.030603864 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.875 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.375 5.23603664747 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201054446193 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104272401261 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547407687827 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141558100416 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356416318598 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.