Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past, people ate food that was better for their health than they do today. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
<span style="font-size: 19.36px;">There is no doubt that people need to eat to keep lives every day; however, how much do we know about the food we eat in? As far as I am concerned, the food we eat nowadays is far worse for our health than the counterpart in the past for the following reasons.
To begin with, more pesticides and chemical fertilizers are used in our food today, for the purpose of increasing productivity. On the contrary, people used natural animal droppings as fertilizers to cultivate fruits, vegetables, and grains in the past. According to research from Beijing University, having vegetables fertilized by pesticides for a long time will increase the risk of stomach cancer. Thus, the previous food is much healthier than today. I still remember when I was a 6-year-old girl living in the countryside with my grandparents; my grandparents had a small yard planted various kinds of vegetables, such as tomatoes and cucumbers, without using any chemical substance. My grandparents only eat these vegetables planted by themselves and both have lived long life expectancies.
Moreover, people now are prone to eat out or order the take-out food for they are tied up with their busy jobs and business. While it will be more convenient for modern people, the truth is that meals from the food stalls or restaurants are not healthy and unsanitary enough. As we know, to make the normal food materials more delicious and tempting, cooks will use deep oil and more salts or use unhealthy methods to cook them, such as frying and baking. And there is another possibility that instead of changing the cooking oil frequently, the cook keeps using the same bottle of oil for the whole day, so they can save some money from the oil. In contrast, The people used to cook and eat at home; they even ate home-made foods when they went out.
Granted, people are able to eat various food with more nutrients than before, such as the flax, chia seeds and some kinds of deep-sea fish. These foods with more proteins or dietary fibers and less fat are just coming into our views and people can definitely benefit from them. However, we can not ignore the truth that we do live in an era with more unhealthy food than healthy ones.
In conclusion, it is true that the food people ate before was healthier than us today.</span><br>
- TPO55 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past people ate food that was better for their health than they do today Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 94
- Older teenagers 16 19 should be allowed to work at paid part time job or not 95
- tpo34Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phones, online games, and social networking Web sites.Use specific reasons and exa 73
- Hail—pieces of ice that form and fall from clouds instead of snow or rain—has always been a problem for farmers in some areas of the United States. Hail pellets can fall with great force and destroy crops in the field. Over the last few decades, a met 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, still, thus, while, as to, in conclusion, in contrast, no doubt, such as, it is true, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1951.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 402.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85323383085 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8716349386 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55223880597 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7996713659 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.764705882 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6470588235 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.41176470588 5.45110844103 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269715134609 0.236089414692 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0927320008319 0.076458572812 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513388179622 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155668490461 0.150856017488 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0173910946795 0.0645574589148 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.