The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds.
Nowadays, there is a different view of the issue about whether the machines could beat us or not. Depending on personal experiences and beliefs, we may find some people think that machines are just tools, therefore, no matter how to developing, the human mind will always win, while others hold an opposite attitude which they support the machines can be superior us. As far as I concerned, I believe that machines really have the chance to surpass human minds but some of the things they could not do. The following discussion will explore my view.
Indeed, machines are made by the human, and the purpose why we create such variety of machines is to let them do things which we are not liking to do such as some heavy works, or routine works. When we create machines, people only give them the partial ability to do what we want them to do, and we rarely put the ability to adapt for machines, let alone thinking. Therefore, machines wanting to win the human minds seems impossible.
On the other hand, with the development of technologies, the statement of machines never win is less tenable. The best example is AlphaGO. AlphaGO is a decision maker of AI, and its first time to be widely known is in the game of GO. In the past ten or twenty years, scientists always wished to create a way to win the game on the board of GO, but they all had failed. However, AlphaGO is entirely different. It not only win the game of GO but also win not just a few games. In the beginning, many players in the field of GO disdain this system that they think the best the machines could do might only beat the amateurs in the GO games, unfortunately, they all lose. AlphaGO now is the best player in that field, and no one could follow its step. It even designs some of the extraordinary and powerful ways of the steps which the first player of the human may not understand. To this point, machines look like tending to be better than human.
In fact, human minds and machines have their own talents. In recent, machines are more and more powerful in calculation and decision making, and even have the competence to thinking. Thus, in some of the standard, the machines are already superior us. Nevertheless, in the other domains such as moral thinking, I am afraid that machines will never win humanity. The most special place to the animal is the expression of the feeling.
In conclusion, despite the fact that machines are already prevailing the human minds in some domains, there are some other factors we should consider discreetly. Hence, we cannot presumptuously believe the statement.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | shoeb_athar | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | DH123 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | arjun2112 | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | ajay yadav | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | Nithin Narla | 50 | view |
- People's attitudes are determined more by their immediate situation or surroundings than by society as a whole. 58
- A/D : The most important investment that can be made to the education of children aged four to seven is giving them a computer. 60
- Students should always question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively. 50
- Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws. 62
- No field of study can advance significantly unless it incorporates knowledge and experience from outside that field. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 466, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...e the chance to surpass human minds but some of the things they could not do. The following...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...hines is to let them do things which we are not liking to do such as some heavy works, or rout...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 765, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... could follow its step. It even designs some of the extraordinary and powerful ways of the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 193, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ve the competence to thinking. Thus, in some of the standard, the machines are already supe...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, really, so, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion, in fact, such as, i am afraid, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2137.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 459.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65577342048 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62863751936 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51466901681 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492374727669 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 670.5 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.38483146067 251% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 57.279225922 60.3974514979 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0416666667 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.125 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.21951772744 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356527486042 0.243740707755 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102040459531 0.0831039109588 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.095125360063 0.0758088955206 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210913034362 0.150359130593 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0720738847151 0.0667264976115 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 14.1392134831 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 12.1639044944 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.