We learn our most valuable lessons in life from struggling with our limitations rather than from enjoying our successes.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The statement above claims that the most valuable lessons in life are attained from struggling with our limitations rather than from enjoying our successes. Restrictions such as personal, social, and monetary limitations force us to become creative and think outside of the box. These kinds of limitations can also be the push that people need to succeed--to show that even in the face of adversity, an uphill battle can still be won. However, success, with all of its consequential complications, can also bring with it, a whole host of valuable life lessons.
Limitations force humans to think outside of the box. Take for example, Kelvin Doe, a West African teenager from Sierra Leone. Born into a poor family in a poor area, this town's educational resources and infrastructure were severely lacking. This forced Kelvin Doe to get creative. He collected scrap metals and discarded tech from local junkyards and deconstructed them to flesh out useful parts. He used all the recycled parts to build useful, nifty gadgets such as homemade batteries, generators, and even a transistor radio. His innovative skills were so impressive that they caught the attention of world-renowned academic institutions such as Harvard and MIT. Even though Kelvin Doe had limited resources, he was able to maximize their potential by thinking outside the box. This is a stunning contrast to the engineers of big engineering companies such as IBM and Apple who have all the resources in the world and still struggle to push out innovative products every year.
Furthermore, limitations test the will and determination of our character. Stephen Hawking was a brilliant young physicist who was diagnosed with ALS during his time in college. ALS immediately began affecting his day to day life, and he soon found himself in a wheelchair. As the disease progressed, he would slowly lose most of his motor function. Rather than give up, however, these hardships forced Hawking to try even harder. He continued his research in theoretical physics despite all odds and made revolutionary contributions to the field such as insight into blackhole radiation and his works on the grad unification theory. Struggling with limitations tests human beings, either pushing them to the breaking point or, in the case of Hawking, pushing them to success despite all odds.
However, it is sometimes unadulterated success that comes concomitant with the most valuable lessons in life. Mark Zuckerberg was a bright young Harvard student who is now infamous for his most prized creation--Facebook. Facebook’s early years--where its product's reachability was limited, as was its funding—were the easiest years of its lifespan hitherto. As Facebook and Zuckerberg gained notoriety and, consequently, success, was when they truly began to face real problems. Massive scandals such as privacy breaches, board member revolts, fake news, and political cyber warfare being waged on their platforms were just a few of numerous issues they faced. Only while enjoying the successes of his brainchild, Facebook, did Mark Zuckerberg arguably learn some of his most valuable life lessons. Lessons such as the importance of ethics in technology and loyalty; lessons more valuable than those attained during Facebook's primitive days.
Life lessons are not discrete: learning them through struggling with limitations is not mutually exclusive from learning them through enjoying the fruits of success. Humans learn life lessons every day, in all types of situations. Sometimes struggles such as poverty or physical disabilities carry the most important life lessons, whereas other times it is from enjoying success itself that we stumble upon our most valuable life lessons. Either way, one thing is certain, despite the adversities one may face in life, humans are known for their perseverance and will for progression, despite all odds.
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 75
- Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or m 16
- Claim: We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from thosewhose views contradict our own.Reason: Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree 66
- Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated.Write a response in which you discuss 58
- Some people believe that scientific discoveries have given us a much better understanding of the world around us. Others believe that science has revealed to us that the world is infinitely more complex than we ever realized.Write a response in which you 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 168, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...Born into a poor family in a poor area, this towns educational resources and infrast...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, whereas, while, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 33.0505617978 160% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 81.0 58.6224719101 138% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3292.0 2235.4752809 147% => OK
No of words: 613.0 442.535393258 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37030995106 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.97582523872 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93533967487 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 333.0 215.323595506 155% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543230016313 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 995.4 704.065955056 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 20.2370786517 153% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.7292129574 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.193548387 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7741935484 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.32258064516 5.21951772744 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.2758426966 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239342727103 0.243740707755 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0646933172062 0.0831039109588 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105464137357 0.0758088955206 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152585296327 0.150359130593 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0984526382859 0.0667264976115 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 175.0 100.480337079 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.