In the modern world it is possible to shop, work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face-to-face contact with others. Is this a positive or negative development?
Thanks to the development of the Internet that people in this contemporary society have opportunities to shop, work or even communicate with different people worldwide. Although there are a lot of positive aspects of this trend, the negative ones are undeniable due to the lack of face-to-face contact among citizens.
On the one hand, it is clear that the Internet is generally handy in many ways. Firstly, it helps people save time and energy. Just with a few minutes that buyers can choose their favorite products and get it delivered within a short period without going out. It is also simple that children or even the elderly can use it efficiently. Moreover, employees can now work at home through the Internet; therefore, they have more time for families or other types of work. Secondly, the social-networking sites assist people in keeping in touch with their long-distance relationship. Making video calls or sending text messages is significantly one of the best ways to maintain those contacts.
On the other hand, there are some drawbacks when people depend on the Internet too much. In terms of real-life relationships, people are less likely to start a conversation in person or getting into a deep talk with their friends or families. In fact, they prefer to building online contacts than keeping the real ones around them. Consequently, there are more break-ups and divorces happened recently. From the safety perspective, teenagers, especially the girls, are facing various dangers when using social-networking sites like Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat and the like. Pedophiles usually adopt false identities that may harm children without the recognition of their parents.
From all the above-mentioned, the development of the Internet has brought both positive and negative aspects to human lives. People should think carefully when using it in order to gain benefits without getting any harms.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-18 | huathibichngoc.c3.ltt@gmail.com | 84 | view |
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- Topic: Some people think that it is good for people in a country to broadcast foreign films and TV shows. Others, however, think it is best to produce local films and shows. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 81
- Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty, while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it must be stopped. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
- The pie charts below show the causes the diseases in developing and developed countries 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 268, Rule ID: PREFER_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'build'?
Suggestion: build
...ds or families. In fact, they prefer to building online contacts than keeping the real o...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1621.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33223684211 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97251774688 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611842105263 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.8189583645 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3529411765 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8823529412 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.70588235294 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308180329483 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0771802962818 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0779714547128 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199550443999 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123768964823 0.056905535591 217% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.