The table below gives information on UK acid rain emissions, measured in millions of tonnes from four different sectors between 1990 and 2007.
The line graph illustrates the amount of acid rain emitted by four sectors in Britain during a 17-year-period between 1991 and 2007.
Overall, it is clear that the number of acid rain emissions dropped significantly throughout the period surveyed. Moreover, other industries emitted the largest amount of rain, while domestic use produced the lowest. Units are measured in millions of tonnes.
In 1990, there were approximately 3.3 million tonnes of acid rain created by electricity, gas and water supply. The transport and communication produced around 0.6 million tonnes and was followed by domestic use, which emitted nearly 0.5 million tonnes of acid rain. Other industries contributed just about 2 million tonnes of acid rain.
In 2007, the amount of acid rain produced by electricity, gas and water supply witnessed a sudden downward trend of 2.8 million tonnes and stood at exactly 0.5. Meanwhile, the emissions from domestic use and other industries also dropped gradually to around 0.2 and 1.2 million tonnes respectively. However, the figure for acid rain emitted from transport and communication saw a slight increase and reached a high peak of 1 million tonnes in 2005 before falling to nearly 1.2 in the end.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-09-27 | lattethuc | 73 | view |
2022-08-02 | Hanabi | 84 | view |
2022-07-26 | @annie3010 | 84 | view |
2022-07-21 | Trần Chí Hiển | view | |
2022-01-23 | moyonakako | 80 | view |
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods. 73
- For school children, their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 78
- The diagrams below show how houses can be protected in areas which are prone to flooding 64
- The table below gives information on households with a regular use of car in Great Britain from 1971 to 2007 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1037.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29081632653 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80448467976 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551020408163 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.7595476261 43.030603864 164% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.222222222 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7777777778 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329308086509 0.215688989381 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154192776791 0.103423049105 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576983543363 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208836679425 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0542343742899 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.