With the increasing population, communication via the Internet and text messaging, face-to-face communication will become a thing of the past. Agree or disagree?
The past few decades have witnessed the prevalence of Internet-based and technological communication. it is said that the presence of these communicating types make face-to-face one archaic. From my perspective, I vigorously take issue with this view as some reasons given below.
On the one hand, it is undisputed that the unrestricted access to the Internet has benefited greatly the public for its convenience and comfort. telecommunication tools including email, instant messaging or social networks undoubtedly facilitate people’s interaction bringing people closer together. An international student or a foreign worker in the UK, for example, can deliver a message to his friends or family back home in Vietnam, only at the click of a mouse regardless of geographical barriers. On top of that, through online communication, money is saved as it is much cheaper, faster and efficient to transfer information around.
At the same time, traditional face-to-face communication is not unreservedly replaced despite these above benefits of telecommunication. For instance, oral conversation is indispensable in situations as a relationship. Lovers need body contact such as a hug and a kiss, which are impossibly done in letters or emails. Even they can use social networks to communicate, being apart for a long time is utterly not beneficial to a relationship. Furthermore, real-life contact is the most preferable way to express one’s behavior because eye contact and body language are required for feeling expressions.
To sum up, in spite of several advantages of the communicating development, virtual communication sustainably plays a pivotal role in our life and cannot be thoroughly supplanted somehow.
- Woman and men are commonly seen as having different strengths and weaknesses. Is it right to exclude males or females from certain professions because of their gender 84
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree 92
- Climate change is a big environmental problem that has become critical in last couple of decades Some people claim that humans should stop burning fossil fuels and use only alternative energy resources such as wind and solar power Others say that oil gas 75
- Woman and men are commonly seen as having different strengths and weaknesses. Is it right to exclude males or females from certain professions because of their gender 78
- With the increasing population, communication via the Internet and text messaging, face-to-face communication will become a thing of the past. Agree or disagree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 103, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...-based and technological communication. it is said that the presence of these comm...
^^
Line 3, column 146, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Telecommunication
...public for its convenience and comfort. telecommunication tools including email, instant messagin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, for example, for instance, such as, in spite of, to sum up, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1476.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67692307692 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.60210326462 2.80592935109 128% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.7 0.561755894193 125% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9055194182 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.538461538 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.30769230769 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159681443539 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0523547371961 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0782390467007 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100888132856 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0698019154154 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.34 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.